The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: "One good thing about music, when it hits you, you feel no pain." - Bob Marley



Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Gibson vs PRS decision reversed

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2004-2005Message format
 
Beal
Posted 2005-09-16 9:06 AM (#137138)
Subject: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
A while ago Old Henry sued PRS over the single cut guitar claiming that it was too close to the Les Paul design(as if!!). He won. An appellet court has reviewed the case and come down completely in favor of PRS.(as they should)

I hope this is the end of it and I hope that Paul has some way to recoup the millions Henry cost him in the legal battle.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
an4340
Posted 2005-09-16 11:07 AM (#137139 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
May 2003
Posts: 4389

Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands
To paraphrase chariman mao:
Let a thousand les paul copies bloom!
I own a les "inspired" guitar; Gibson was ridiculous.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2005-09-16 11:18 AM (#137140 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Way back...way, way back in '69 a friend had a Univox Les Paul copy. It played better than any "real" Les Paul I ever tried.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mark in Boise
Posted 2005-09-16 11:30 AM (#137141 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 12755

Location: Boise, Idaho
I had a Univox 335 copy back then. After some work it also played great. Wish I hadn't sold it when I bought my first Ovation, but I thought $125 for a 10 year old Univox was a lot of money.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Stephen P
Posted 2005-09-16 2:52 PM (#137142 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
June 2005
Posts: 274

Location: Maryland, USA
Can somebody show me a picture of the PRS guitar that this case is about?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2005-09-16 2:55 PM (#137143 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
It's his single cutaway model. Doesn't even come close to looking like a LP but then when did Hank sue logically? Maybe Paul Reed spilled a drink on him at a NAMM show or something.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2005-09-16 3:56 PM (#137144 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
PRS

Stephen, you had better keep your eyes out for Hank. He might stick ya for your project guitar
Top of the page Bottom of the page
samova
Posted 2005-09-16 4:00 PM (#137145 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 970

Location: Atlanta,Ga.
read this closely,i love how PRS takes a couple of shots at Gibson..

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellate Court Awards Victory to Paul Reed Smith Guitars (PRS) Over Gibson In a long-pending trademark dispute between PRS Guitars and Gibson Guitars Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit today reversed a lower court decision and ordered the dismissal of Gibson's suit against PRS. The decision also immediately vacates the injunction prohibiting the sale and production of PRS’s award winning Singlecut® Guitar. Paul Reed Smith Guitars announced today that it will immediately resume production of its Singlecut® guitars. Paul Smith, the founder of PRS, stated “We are delighted that the appellate court affirmed what we and the industry have long known: the PRS Singlecuts® are musical instruments of the highest quality that would never be confused with a competitor’s product.” In the litigation, Gibson alleged that concert goers in a smoky concert hall might not be able to differentiate a PRS Singlecut® from a Gibson Les Paul. The appellate court rejected that trademark theory out-of-hand, emphasizing Gibson’s concession in court arguments that “only an idiot” would confuse the two products at the point of sale. William Coston, PRS lawyer, observed that the decision is a vindication of PRS’ meritorious defense of unfounded allegations: “We agree with the Court and Gibson’s own counsel that “only an idiot” would be confused. Sadly, the injunction lasted too long and the court process was too long and costly, depriving consumers of the right to choose between the PRS Singlecut® and the Gibson Les Paul. We hope that Gibson will now compete in the marketplace and not use litigation to obtain unfair advantage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top of the page Bottom of the page
WeaserP
Posted 2005-09-16 4:06 PM (#137146 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 417

Location: Cicero, NY
Knew the day was coming but now it's offical - we idiots are on our own. Or aren't we? I'm confused...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2005-09-16 4:18 PM (#137147 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
Originally posted by WeaserP:
we idiots are on our own... I'm confused...
For No. 1...Stand.
For No. 2...Sit.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
leftovertion
Posted 2005-09-16 4:41 PM (#137148 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
July 2004
Posts: 338

Location: Omaha
Jeff W.,

Ironic, that under that pic of the PRS Singlecut, there is a *REAL* LP copy for sale!!!

:rolleyes:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Stephen P
Posted 2005-09-16 9:05 PM (#137149 - in reply to #137138)
Subject: Re: Gibson vs PRS decision reversed


Joined:
June 2005
Posts: 274

Location: Maryland, USA
The PRS SIngle cut doesn't look at all like a Gibson LP.

Maybe they just felt that the fact the PRS was award winning kind of made them feel like their territory was being invaded, as most RECENT (Japan doesn't make LP clones anymore) Les Paul clones aren't normally great guitars (at stock at least), and the fact that this was a good guitar that kind of looked like the Les Paul made them Henry feel agressive.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclub™ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)