|
|
 Joined: June 2002 Posts: 6202
Location: Phoenix AZ | I'm getting old. I owned these guitars but now seem totally confused about the model numbers. Bare with me:
1681 is Adamas II deep non-cutaway, that's clear.
1581 is Adamas II deep cutaway, single epaulet. So far so good.
1881 is Adamas II shallow cutaway, TWO epaulets.
Now it gets interesting.
Was there an Adamas II deep cutaway, TWO epaulets? I swear it exists. What is the model number?
Dave |
|
| |
|
Joined: November 2003 Posts: 11039
Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub | 1587??
EDIT: This would be an Adamas I now, woud'nit |
|
| |
|
Joined: January 2005 Posts: 640
Location: boulder | aren't they still just 1581's w/two epaulets. I have a 1581 with both bass and treble soundholes. (it was made in 1999, maybe they switched over time??) peace |
|
| |
|
 Joined: June 2002 Posts: 6202
Location: Phoenix AZ | I think fugot is right. 1581 is cutaway deep bowl. At some point they had 2 epaulets and then later only one. Dave |
|
| |
|
Joined: August 2004 Posts: 709
Location: Germany | The Ovation catalogs show different versions of the 1581 over the years.
1982 and 1988: single epaulet
1994 and 1997: two epaulets
So I think they switched from single to two epaulet version somewhere in the early 90'.
Karl |
|
| |
|
 Joined: March 2004 Posts: 1388
Location: Paris/France | I think that the Adamas II cutaway version with 2 epaulets were not enable before 1994.
Jérôme :) |
|
| |
|
 Joined: March 2004 Posts: 1388
Location: Paris/France | In this GERMAN CATALOG from 1993 (page #16), the 1581-5 with single epaulet.
In this US CATALOG from 1994 (page #6), the same 1581-5 with two epaulets.
Jérôme ;) |
|
| |
|
Joined: March 2004 Posts: 241
Location: Le Havre (France) | I confirm,
I own an Adamas 2 deep cutaway from 1994 with two epaulets and its number is 1581. |
|
| |
|
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 15678
Location: SoCal | And I confirm, that I never had sex with that woman (possibly her mother tho')...... |
|
| |
|
 Joined: January 2002 Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | It would not be a 7 for the 4th digit, it would be a 1. The SS bowl would have been the second digit but I don't know what it would have been.
I think McPaul has it right. |
|
| |
|
Joined: December 2004 Posts: 1116
Location: Keller, TX | I can neither confirm nor deny...
(Ain't plagarism great?) |
|
| |