| ||
The Ovation Fan Club | ||
| ||
Random quote: "There are more love songs than anything else. If songs could make you do something we'd all love one another." -Frank Zappa |
What neck width?
| View previous thread :: View next thread | |
Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2008 | Message format |
bauerhillboy |
| ||
Joined: February 2004 Posts: 1634 Location: Warren,Pa. | I'm connecting with a 17 year old this week at his parents' request. He's outstripped 4 guitar teachers in 3 years...each one taking him as far as they could. He was encouraged by his last teacher to learn to read music. A classical guitar was suggested for this next plateau, but I suggested that he get a steel string with a wide neck instead (more versatile). What nut width would you suggest for learning to read music? John <>{ | ||
Beal |
| ||
Joined: January 2002 Posts: 14127 Location: 6 String Ranch | They are unrelated. If he loves guitar let him keep going, don't start this "classical" stuff, you just might kill it altogether. | ||
Weaser P |
| ||
Joined: October 2005 Posts: 5330 Location: Cicero, NY | I'd agree with Beal. A classical got me out of the blocks and got me where I am today. Well, on second thought... | ||
FlySig |
| ||
Joined: October 2005 Posts: 4046 Location: Utah | He's outstripped 4 guitar teachers in 3 years...each one taking him as far as they could. He was encouraged by his last teacher to learn to read music. Learning to read music was, uh, like part of lesson #1. At least back in the day. Three years and doesn't read music? That says something about somebody, either the student or the teachers. Personally, I don't think more equipment is what this kid needs. | ||
mtnbikerfred |
| ||
Joined: March 2005 Posts: 1421 Location: Orange County, California | Originally posted by bauerhillboy: What ever is most comfortable to play. I think 1 3/4 is the "standard". 1 13/126 is wider 1 7/8" is really wide. 1 11/16 too skinny for me.What nut width would you suggest for learning to read music? | ||
an4340 |
| ||
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 4389 Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands | On a classical you'll want 1.75 or wider. On an acoustic you'll want 1 11/16 or wider. On an electric you'll want 1 5/8 or wider. There is no correlation between width and reading music. The standard ovation neck is 1 11/16 and is a very common size, so get him used to that if he wants an acoustic or an electric. If he wants a classical get a two inch neck. Though I like the 1.75 country artist. Let us know what he gets. | ||
schroeder |
| ||
Joined: November 2004 Posts: 4413 | I'm mystified (my usual condition) - what's wrong with classical guitar? | ||
Weaser P |
| ||
Joined: October 2005 Posts: 5330 Location: Cicero, NY | Nothing. The way I read it John was just considering pointing him to a steel string as he might find it more common in the future. | ||
schroeder |
| ||
Joined: November 2004 Posts: 4413 | I was referring to beal's this "classical" stuff. | ||
bauerhillboy |
| ||
Joined: February 2004 Posts: 1634 Location: Warren,Pa. | He's not interested in "classical" anything. I just assumed that if he was gonna learn to read, he'd be playing notes as opposed to chords...so a wider neck would be better for playing individual notes while following sheet music. But what do I know...I only play chords and strum. Maybe he'll move toward finger-style playing. They use a wider neck, don't they? John <>{ | ||
Capo Guy |
| ||
Joined: December 2004 Posts: 4394 Location: East Tennessee | Woody has a folklore up for sale. 1 7/8" nut. | ||
MWoody |
| ||
Joined: December 2003 Posts: 13987 Location: Upper Left USA | GGG/Capo Guy/Mike W/? is correct. Message me if you want. | ||
bauerhillboy |
| ||
Joined: February 2004 Posts: 1634 Location: Warren,Pa. | He's not interested in "classical" anything. I just assumed that if he was gonna learn to read, he'd be playing notes as opposed to chords...so a wider neck would be better for playing individual notes while following sheet music. But what do I know...I only play chords and strum. Maybe he'll move toward finger-style playing. They use a wider neck, don't they? John <>{ | ||
Mark in Boise |
| ||
Joined: March 2005 Posts: 12758 Location: Boise, Idaho | I do fingerstyle on all different size necks, not very well on any size. I think the only reason a wider neck is easier is if you have bigger hands or fingers. I often use barre chords on finger picking songs and it is much easier to barre a narrower neck with a radius on the fretboard. It's toughest on a flat 2" classical neck. It's also difficult to switch back and forth, since the string spacing and feel of the neck is different. If he likes the guitar he has with a regular neck, let him stay with it. Chords are just combinations of notes, so it shouldn't make a difference if he is trying to learn the notes. I wish I had learned to play the notes. | ||
STK |
| ||
Joined: July 2007 Posts: 161 Location: Seoul, Korea | John: I started out playing classical guitar and have short, stubby fingers. It is a challenge to do barre chords with wide neck as well as learning to stretch 1st fret to 5th fret, etc. However, once you master on the wider neck classical guitar, it is a breeze to play on a narrower neck. If you are going to learn to use pick (which I am at the moment), it is definitely easier to play on a narrower neck steel string guitar IMHO. Reading notes or playing single string notes, it does not matter which types of guitar you play. It is more the kind of music you want to play, I think. BTW, my teenage sons tell me it is not sexy to play classical. Guitar Hero rules the day! | ||
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way. | |
(Delete all cookies set by this site) | |