|
|
Joined:
November 2002
Posts: 266
Location: Tampa, Florida | What the difference, soundwise between the two? I have played a CVT, but not the SMT. Thanks |
|
| |
|
Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 1817
Location: Minden, Nebraska | I have had a couple of CVTs and several SMTs, but never had two of the different types at the same time in order to A-B compare.
But I did note that the CVT seemed to me to be a bit more 'alive' and responsive. I do like the SMTs, but the CVT sound really impressed me. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2003
Posts: 4389
Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands | Zchord,
I concur with Paul, the CVT is an awesome sounding instrument, and that's an excellent characterization of "lively". I too haven't been able to do a side-by-side comparison with the SMT, but it's by recollection that the SMT is a "warmer" sounding guitar but I really want to do a comparison. There are people on this board who are real pros, and I think if you do a search you'll find a couple discussions on this topic. |
|
| |
Difference between a CVT and a SMT
