The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: "Jazz... isn't that just a series of mistakes disguised as musical composition?” - David St. Hubbins of Spinal Tap



Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Behringer Shark DSP110 versus LR Baggs Para Acoustic DI

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2004-2005Message format
 
peterbright
Posted 2004-01-29 2:01 PM (#196302)
Subject: Behringer Shark DSP110 versus LR Baggs Para Acoustic DI


Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 420

Location: On the beach in Southwest Florida
Would you use both of these or is one enough?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mr. Ovation
Posted 2004-01-29 3:54 PM (#196303 - in reply to #196302)
Subject: Re: Behringer Shark DSP110 versus LR Baggs Para Acoustic DI


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 7222

Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
I'm not sure how well the Shark would work as a DI as I haven't tried them for that. Behringer makes an excellent DI. I have several. They are silent, have attenuaters, ground lifts, very full featured for the price. Paul might know if the pre-amp mode of the Shark would work as an effective DI, I only use them for emergencies to fix the otherwise unfixable.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
peterbright
Posted 2004-01-29 4:12 PM (#196304 - in reply to #196302)
Subject: Re: Behringer Shark DSP110 versus LR Baggs Para Acoustic DI


Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 420

Location: On the beach in Southwest Florida
Use whatever DI & have the Shark as a backup when feedback cannot be controlled any other way? So it makes sense to own both.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2004-01-29 4:13 PM (#196305 - in reply to #196302)
Subject: Re: Behringer Shark DSP110 versus LR Baggs Para Acoustic DI


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
The Shark will work perfectly as a DI box, as it has balanced & unbalanced inputs & outputs. In addition to the DI facilty you get a high pass filter with user-definable roll-off point, a compressor (not a great compressor, but it's OK) a noise gate & of course the 24-filter automatic Feedback destroyer. It also works as a mic-preamp & phantom power supply. The only disadvantages are that it has no EQ & it needs a wall-wart. Also YOU MUST READ THE MANUAL CAREFULLY as the correct input gain set-up is vital.

I use a Baggs Para Acoustic & a Boss AD5 with a Shark at the end of the chain, but as a one-box problem-solver for acoustic intruments the Shark is unbeatable for the money.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
peterbright
Posted 2004-01-29 7:18 PM (#196306 - in reply to #196302)
Subject: Re: Behringer Shark DSP110 versus LR Baggs Para Acoustic DI


Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 420

Location: On the beach in Southwest Florida
Thanks Paul, I believe you have given me the info I need to spend some money this weekend.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mr. Ovation
Posted 2004-01-29 8:59 PM (#196307 - in reply to #196302)
Subject: Re: Behringer Shark DSP110 versus LR Baggs Para Acoustic DI


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 7222

Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Thanks Paul,
I've only used the Shark on mic's and inline in LOUD stage situations. I wondered how the preamp was for use on a guitar or just basically as a DI. I figured it would, but didn't want to guess.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclub™ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)