The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: "Believe me when I say that some of the most amazing music in history was made on equipment that's not as good as what you own right now." - Jol Dantzig



Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Ovation Weight Difference

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2004-2005Message format
 
Slipkid
Posted 2004-02-15 8:26 AM (#194661)
Subject: Ovation Weight Difference



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
At the Guitar Club I got to play Brians 1895 (?) Legend. When I pick it up I noticed quite a weight difference from my '71 Balladeer. The Legand was heavier. How come? They are both deep bowls and they look like the same basic guitar. Is the Kaman bar heavier than the old truss rod system?
Brad
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2004-02-15 8:40 AM (#194662 - in reply to #194661)
Subject: Re: Ovation Weight Difference


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
The Legend is an electric model so the preamp makes a difference to the weight. I think the earlier cloth bowls were lighter also.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2004-02-15 8:56 AM (#194663 - in reply to #194661)
Subject: Re: Ovation Weight Difference


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15654

Location: SoCal
Along with Temp's comment, the Kaman bar is quite heavy. This is a reason that the LX series developed a new system to brace the neck.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2004-02-15 10:51 AM (#194664 - in reply to #194661)
Subject: Re: Ovation Weight Difference



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
the K-Bar adds weight
the bowls got heavier
the electronics add weight
.030 of finish adds weight

that's why the new aLeX series is so interesting, lighter and better truss rod, lighter bowl, thinner finish. Got alot going for it, even the aLeX name (now that it's named after someone and not some F#*@$^% J car that some mp probably got a hard-on lusting after)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Old Applause Owner
Posted 2004-02-15 4:35 PM (#194665 - in reply to #194661)
Subject: Re: Ovation Weight Difference


Joined:
July 2003
Posts: 1922

Location: Canton (Detroit), MI
There is a significant difference in weight between my two 12-strings....the 2001 Melissa Etheridge is much heavier than the 1981 Glen Campbell. Most of the weight difference is in the neck, though, so I figured it was the Kaman bar.

Roger

1976 Applause AA14-4 6-String
1981 Ovation 1118-1 Glen Campbell 12-string
2001 Adamas 1598-MERB Melissa Etheridge 12-String
2003 Celebrity CC01 Spruce Top 6-String
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2004-02-15 7:30 PM (#194666 - in reply to #194661)
Subject: Re: Ovation Weight Difference



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
Rog, there's alot in the bowl too, big difference. The new aLeX is so much better.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclubâ„¢ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)