The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: "Got time to breathe, got time for music." --Briscoe Darling.



Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
UKII "too clean"?

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2008Message format
 
muzza
Posted 2008-11-16 6:02 AM (#11813)
Subject: UKII "too clean"?



Joined:
August 2005
Posts: 3736

Location: Sunshine State, Australia
Just after AJ loaned me his UKII, (back in August) I took it to work to let a colleague give it a workout, then on the way home, I took it in to see my local guitar store to get his opinion.

Both said, in not so many words, that it had a very "clean" sound and needed some "dirt".

Something someone said in a thread recently (Strat vs Les Paul) got me thinking about the above comments.

The thread I'm referring to said (something like) you can make a Strat sound dirty like a Gibson, but you can't get a Gibson to make a clean Strat sound.

Now, I know as much about electric guitars as Ozwatto knows about computers. :rolleyes: Wouldn't having a clean sounding guitar be much more versatile? Don't you get that 'dirty' sound through one of the myriad of pedals anyway?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
schroeder
Posted 2008-11-16 7:09 AM (#11814 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 4413

Yes.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2008-11-16 8:12 AM (#11815 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
I can't see how the UK11 could be described as "clean" Those pickups have enough output to overdrive anything. The dirt comes from the amplifer, in the way the input gain is balanced against output level, or you could use overdirve/distorton pedals.

Shroeder, remember when I had the T-Head plugged in an amp and swapped it for the UK11 which was at least double in volume? That's hardly a "clean" pickup in terms of output.

Now if there were referring to the "tone" being clean, then compared to say a Gibson humbucker then maybe. The UK11 pickups are brighter than most humbuckers but still have a very high output. Most high output pickups tend sound a little dull, as the extra coil windings tend to kill the treble response a little.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MusicMishka
Posted 2008-11-16 9:06 AM (#11816 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5563

Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
Mine had a very smooth "clean" tone but the p/u's had enough output to nicely drive the amp(Fender Deluxe)in the clean channel; in the drive (2) channel it was smooth sustained singing sound w/ the ammount of "dirt" according to the amount of pre amp dialed in; and in the overdrive (3) channel, it could get insane...
I have Clestions in both the amp and extra cabinet and was amazed at the great sound from the UK II.....It has the ability and flexability to sound pretty much like anything you want or need...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
schroeder
Posted 2008-11-16 9:45 AM (#11817 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 4413

I remember the UKII very well - the most powerful pup I've heaqrd outside of a retro-fitted EMG active humbucker in a strat.
I was saying yes to the desirability of a great clean sound out of a guitar - like muzz says you can always dial in the filth but a good clean sound is something too many guitars lack. And amps - it's only in recent years that I've heard what I think of as a good clean sound out of a Marshall. And I've never thought much of Orange clean channels either.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2008-11-16 9:51 AM (#11818 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
It's like being able to grow a beard...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2008-11-16 1:09 PM (#11819 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
UK2 will get as dirty as you want.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
fillhixx
Posted 2008-11-16 1:41 PM (#11820 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?



Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 4816

Location: Campbell River, British Columbia
With clean you can get dirty, but not the other way around.

Smoooth....now that's harder to find. Jazz git smooth.

"Orange" clean sound? I know the Blues, Grey and Dirty.....but I never heard Orange. (Besides, it's too hard to rhyme.)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mr. Ovation
Posted 2008-11-16 2:17 PM (#11821 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 7210

Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Check out Damon's video's of his UKII... Clean?? Really ?? UKII is probably one of the most "flexible" humbuckers out there. Back off the volume and you can get a nice "clean." Lean on it, and you can get as much dirt as you want.

As far as the tone, as was eluded, they are brighter... which is fine. You can always take away bright with the tone control. Inversely, you can't put bright in if it doesn't exist in the first place.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Damon67
Posted 2008-11-16 2:51 PM (#11822 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?



Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6992

Location: Jet City
Originally posted by Mr. Ovation:
Check out Damon's video's of his UKII...
UKII

That's going straight into a Carvin X100B. No pedals except for a bit of OD and delay for the solo.

The UKII is quiet when it comes to noise, but the pickups are way hotter than anything I own or have ever owned. That includes A LOT of freekin electric guitars over the years.
'
Maybe they don't know how to properly describe what they mean. I do that with wine at parties... "absurd, yet flaccid".

Maybe smooth is a better adjective. My Gibby pickups to seem more harsh, more mids which I guess could be considered dirt cuz it sounds like crap in my opinion. I have to do a lot more tweaking on the amps to get tones I like.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
2ifbyC
Posted 2008-11-16 3:17 PM (#11823 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?
Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6268

Location: Florida Central Gulf Coast
Damon,

What an awesome vid. That should go on YouTube!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bluebird
Posted 2008-11-16 3:25 PM (#11824 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?



Joined:
May 2002
Posts: 1445

Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Clean is not the word I would use at all for my Bluebird with UKII electronics, nor is it the case with my nephew's UKII. More of a trick to keep them sounding clean.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Damon67
Posted 2008-11-16 3:38 PM (#11825 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?



Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6992

Location: Jet City
Thanks Johnny. It's up there.

If you go on to youtube and search for "Ovation UKII" only 2 vids come up. This is one.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
2ifbyC
Posted 2008-11-16 3:42 PM (#11826 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?
Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6268

Location: Florida Central Gulf Coast
Originally posted by Damon67:
"Ovation UKII"
Super! I just subscribed.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Damon67
Posted 2008-11-16 3:59 PM (#11827 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?



Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6992

Location: Jet City
Cool. My first YouTube subscriber! :cool:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
an4340
Posted 2008-11-16 4:27 PM (#11828 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?


Joined:
May 2003
Posts: 4389

Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands
Also, to consider is the scale length. Strat or tele is 25.5 and UKII is 24.75, as I recall.

Another reason a tele sounds the way it does is that the harmonics are streched out over the strings while the les paul types are jammed closer together. Hence, the lp comes across as warmer (or muddier, as the overtones are closer together and more piled onto each other) and the tele is brighter (or cleaner) depending on your perspective.

True, you can add dirt thru an overdrive pedal, but I've found it best just to celebrate what they are instead of trying to make a strat sound like an LP. But you're right, it's easier to add dirt to tele, than to brighten an LP. Also, I like a wide neck tele scale because it fits my hands better, some of those LP's get cramped.

To me the UK II gets plenty warm, but other ears will differ.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
FlySig
Posted 2008-11-16 4:36 PM (#11829 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?



Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 4026

Location: Utah
Originally posted by Damon67:
I do that with wine at parties... "absurd, yet flaccid".
There is an age at which alcohol is no longer a performance enhancing substance. They make pills that help, though not with the absurd part. ;)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ozwatto
Posted 2008-11-16 11:52 PM (#11830 - in reply to #11813)
Subject: Re: UKII "too clean"?


Joined:
January 2007
Posts: 672

Location: New South Wales, Australia
Originally posted by muzza:


Now, I know as much about electric guitars as Ozwatto knows about computers. :rolleyes:
Thanks Muzza :D

I can be clean..but I like it dirty
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclub™ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)