The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )
NEW in 2026 Searches both the Ovation FanClub and Ovation Tribute websites

Random quote: "It's much too late to do anything about rock & roll now ..." - Jerry Garcia / Grateful Dead



Jump to page : 12
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2007Message format
 
Tupperware
Posted 2007-03-17 10:10 PM (#110095)
Subject: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
I just received my 1627 Glen Campbell Artist Reissue. I am sorry to report that there is a serious problem with the guitar. Here's the pics:







The problem is that nobody warned me how good this guitar was. And like a fool, I only purchased this as a temporary adoption and the permanent owner is already lined up to take it over in a few months time. The guitar is serial number 41.

I could kick myself for being so stupid. So what to do? I could be greedy and weltch out on the deal? Depriving a nice OFC member of a great guitar that he can't find down under. I could make up some lame excuse like the guitar is damaged and in good faith I could not possibly pass it on to someone else? Damn. I think the best thing to do is just put in in the case and pretend I never played/heard it. At least that way I won't miss it when it's gone.

Here's a good question, why doesn't Ovation just make EVERY guitar sound this good? Forget all the new fangled stuff: Astabula BS bowls, VIP whatever, LXYZ, bowling ball holes ... just build them like they used to. Like this 1627. The only wood topped plastic back I've heard better than this in the past 35 years is the FD14. I'm serious! This makes my $2500. Custom Legend sound like crap and it would reduce any 1537 to kindling wood. Even the stacked V/T preamp is amazing!

Richard, richard, richard ... if I didn't have another one of these (slightly modified) on order for myself we would SERIOUSLY have to talk, my friend. Finders keepers, losers weepers. I don't know how many of these are still for sale out there, but believe me they all should be bought up by OFC members immediately.

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Capo Guy
Posted 2007-03-17 10:53 PM (#110096 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue



Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 4394

Location: East Tennessee
Beautiful Guitar.

In my opinion either the 2 knobber or the stacked tone/volume control is all most players need.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Old Man Arthur
Posted 2007-03-18 12:38 AM (#110097 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue



Joined:
September 2006
Posts: 10777

Location: Keepin' It Weird in Portland, OR
That is a nice guitar. Just be at peace, and enjoy the guitar while you've got it.
Then send it on to parts unknown.

Of course you realize that the un-named party in this party is probably reading this right now!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2007-03-18 1:29 AM (#110098 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15683

Location: SoCal
The only thing I don't like about this guitar is the strange placement of the strap button. It's wwwaaayyy over from the neck, and for me, I needed an extra long strap. Well, there are times when only the best will do. Friday, a Moody Leather (no relation) extra long guitar strap arrived. Expensive, yes. But it looks and feels great. And with that guitar, it's the perfect length. And for anybody who wants to see what it looks like, go to http://www.moodyleather.com . Mines redwood with the curry suede backing.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Goober
Posted 2007-03-18 8:44 AM (#110099 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2004
Posts: 799

Location: Athens, GA & Gnashville
I love mine so much I'm marrying it. :cool:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
gulfcoast
Posted 2007-03-18 8:50 AM (#110100 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 1330

Location: ms
Goober you`ll have to move to Mississippi to be able to marry your guitar...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Goober
Posted 2007-03-18 8:58 AM (#110101 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2004
Posts: 799

Location: Athens, GA & Gnashville
Originally posted by gulfcoast:
Goober you`ll have to move to Mississippi to be able to marry your guitar...
...or Alibaba....where pork is health!!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2007-03-18 9:29 AM (#110102 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
If I were to guess which one guy'd marry his guitar...

I'd have t'guess it'd be some guy named, 'Goober'
Top of the page Bottom of the page
rededdie
Posted 2007-03-18 10:18 AM (#110103 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue



Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 387

Location: Whitecourt, Ab
I know guys who wished they married their guitars instead of evil money grubbing lying cheating *#!$X*
ex-wives
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cholloway
Posted 2007-03-18 10:21 AM (#110104 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 2793

Location: Atlanta, GA.
That's cuz all the guys named 'Bubba' are into banjos!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Goober
Posted 2007-03-18 11:55 AM (#110105 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2004
Posts: 799

Location: Athens, GA & Gnashville
My full name is Goober Bubba Jack Enhauf, FYI!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Goober
Posted 2007-03-18 11:59 AM (#110106 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2004
Posts: 799

Location: Athens, GA & Gnashville
Moody, I think they put the strap button where it is to keep the strap from touching the V/T knobs in various positions (slung over the back like Evlis?). :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2007-03-18 12:02 PM (#110107 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
Goober Bubba Jack Enhauf, that'd make you an AutoEroticPolyInstrumentalist
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Weaser P
Posted 2007-03-18 12:19 PM (#110108 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 5332

Location: Bluffton, SC
And just when we were running short on AEPI's too!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Weaser P
Posted 2007-03-18 12:20 PM (#110109 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 5332

Location: Bluffton, SC
(And how embarrasing it would be if his last name was Mehauf, eh?) :eek:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Oddball
Posted 2007-03-18 5:18 PM (#110110 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
March 2007
Posts: 843

Location: CA
This may be an inside joke that I'm outside of, but can't you just buy a Glen Campbell model yourself? Or buy another one and give THAT to the buddy (without playing it of course)?

But if you're gonna make something up, make it up big — tell him Glen called and wanted THIS guitar for his new tour...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
richardd
Posted 2007-03-18 6:01 PM (#110111 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
May 2002
Posts: 651

Location: Australia
I'm not quite sure what to say Dave.

I'm excited that the guitar sounds so good, nice pics too.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2007-03-18 6:53 PM (#110112 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Originally posted by Oddball:
but can't you just buy a Glen Campbell model yourself?
Already done that, but it'll be a few months before it's built. That's why this 1627 is only a temp. Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Goober
Posted 2007-03-18 9:39 PM (#110113 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2004
Posts: 799

Location: Athens, GA & Gnashville
In Dave's guitar world, ALL things are possible! :)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
FlicKreno aka Solid Top
Posted 2007-03-18 10:25 PM (#110114 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
April 2006
Posts: 2491

Location: Copenhagen Denmark
Comparing a LEGEND (Single Soundhole) with a 1537 (Multi Soundholes)...Oh Come On....ROFL..nice guitar though :)

Vic :cool:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2007-03-18 10:44 PM (#110115 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Vic, I agree. It shouldn't be possible. But damn it, you HAVE to hear this thing! I've owned three 1537's and they are wonderful guitars. But seriously, this reissue is a notch above (at least as heard from the players position). Don't confuse this guitar with the 2nd generation VT braced 1627 crap. The only thing in common are the tuners and TRC. Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
FlicKreno aka Solid Top
Posted 2007-03-19 12:42 AM (#110116 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
April 2006
Posts: 2491

Location: Copenhagen Denmark
Dave,I did not mean to spoil your fun,just meant that, comparing a LEGEND with a 1537,would be a little abstract,these have different design philosophies,my 1617 (1972) has more "overtones" than my 1537 (1983)I will not count my 1618 (1982)
being a 12 stringer, (but talk about "overtones")
I would call my 1537 for my Allrounder ,"Big Voiced" with an Ability to "start - stop" quickly(for lack of a better explanation )while I would consider my LEGEND`s to be "Beaming - ringing"
That`s all I meant,I hope that we`re still buddies ;)

P.S I would like to Hear - Try - Abduct that Great Looking Guitar ( Nice Butt )
Vic :cool:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2007-03-19 1:24 AM (#110117 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Don't worry, you're not spoiling my fun. Heck, I've got the guitar, THAT's the fun. I think the reason I'm so impressed with the 1627 is that it brings back that original ovation sound that for so long got somewhat lost. Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
richardd
Posted 2007-03-19 6:48 AM (#110118 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
May 2002
Posts: 651

Location: Australia
I'm looking forward to hearing it Dave :)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2007-03-19 9:13 AM (#110119 - in reply to #110095)
Subject: Re: Major Problem With 1627 Glen Campbell Reissue


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15683

Location: SoCal
I hope that we`re still buddies


Vic, this Tupperware guy isn't buddies with anybody...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclub™ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)