|
|
Joined:
September 2006
Posts: 347
Location: Reno, NV | So I finally tried the Dean Markley Helix strings in 12-53 80/20. Nothing special at all in my opinion. Just feel and sound like regular ole' 80/20's to me. I was expecting something groundbreaking with the way they were hyping them up. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 2985
Location: Sydney, Australia | Did you use string tubes? |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | gotta use clean string tubes to get the full effect. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 4394
Location: East Tennessee | I tried a set on my OM. I like the way they sound. Put a set on my 000-15S and was not so impressed.
More hype than actual preformance. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | According to credible sources...
"String Tubes will extend the life and improve the tone of standard acoustics strings when used according to the manufacturer's directions, and if used within 48 hours of opening package. Results and opinions vary when used on electric instrument strings and/or if package was opened and tubes were left uninstalled for several days. Imported "off-brand" tubes (Balinese) of latex and/or animal by product origin were not included in this review, and would not be recommended due to human rights violations reported during their manufacturing process."
Wayne Kerr, new product reviews, Acoustic Strings Magazine (Oct 2009)
That pretty much says it all. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2010
Posts: 370
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA | Could someone please put up a link to a maker of 'string tubes' or a brand name to search on... Not finding anything here.
Thanks |
|
| |
|
Joined:
November 2006
Posts: 3969
| Originally posted by Avatar4550:
Could someone please put up a link to a maker of 'string tubes' or a brand name to search on... Not finding anything here.
Thanks Try searching the archives here. Here\'s one to get you started. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2010
Posts: 32
Location: Ohio | I wonder if that would make a difference on my breedlove. It also has a pinless bridge. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | According to the article, string tubes have specific benefits for guitars with pinless bridges (Ovations) which is why so many of us use them. Playing live, or during recording, they reduce feedback and produce a warmer, more acoustic tone. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | The string tubes are only used during the stringing process. They are REMOVED after you thread the string through the pinless bridge.
The string tubes themselves do NOTHING playing live, recording or any other such BS. Their only purpose is to prevent micro fibers of wood dust from clogging the string windings as you pull them through the bridge. In that sense they "help" the sound, but not in a direct way.
This is also why the string tubes have no benefit on pinned bridges, because you are not rasping the string through a wooden hole and subjecting it to clogging like you do on a pinless bridge. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2010
Posts: 370
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA | OK, was trying to do a web search and not finding anything guitar-related... See this is an OFC-created solution.
A question... If using Cleartones or Elixirs (which are already coated...), shouldn't that accomplish the same thing as running it through a piece of polyethylene?
Or is this to allow using non-coated strings and still prevent the bridge windings from getting schmag in them?
Doesn't adding a layer of what would appear to be an absorbent material between the windings and the bridge cut down on energy transfer.
You guys have obviously been doing this for a while now... Would anyone care to write a more in-depth explanation of the theory and practice of how this is actually supposed to work... pictures perhaps?
Thanks |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2010
Posts: 370
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA | Sorry Dave,
We were both typing at the same time... you got in first with the explanation, before my question... |
|
| |
|
Joined:
September 2006
Posts: 10777
Location: Keepin' It Weird in Portland, OR | And do I still need tubes for the higher strings?
The strings without windings?
Or do they still collect crap from the wood anyway? |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | Originally posted by Gallerinski:
The string tubes are only used during the stringing process. They are REMOVED after you thread the string through the pinless bridge.
The string tubes themselves do NOTHING playing live, recording or any other such BS. Their only purpose is to prevent micro fibers of wood dust from clogging the string windings as you pull them through the bridge. In that sense they "help" the sound, but not in a direct way.
This is also why the string tubes have no benefit on pinned bridges, because you are not rasping the string through a wooden hole and subjecting it to clogging like you do on a pinless bridge. Huh? I break them off at the 3" perforation from the ball and leave them that way for the life of the string. To my ear, I get great results but everyone's different. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303
Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066 | DB, you're a silly man.
String tubes should ALWAYS BE REMOVED after you thread them though the pinless bridge. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | OMA, good question. I think technically they are not needed on the plain strings.
DB, I think you could leave them on the strings as long as you cut them off short of the saddle. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | Okay fine, but why the perforation at the 3" mark if not by design? |
|
| |
|
Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 4833
Location: Campbell River, British Columbia | DB, many things that seem to almost make sense really don't.
THIS is what your Helix is supposed to sound like.
(edit: mild content warning. May excite prurient interests....of those easily interested.) |
|
| |
|
Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6268
Location: Florida Central Gulf Coast | Originally posted by dark bar:
Okay fine, but why the perforation at the 3" mark if not by design? You're putin' 'em on backazzards. The perf is so ya don't wrap 'em on the tunas! ;) |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | Originally posted by dark bar:
Okay fine, but why the perforation at the 3" mark if not by design? Performation is to break them off into usable sized segments. But USE is only during the stringing process itself. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2010
Posts: 370
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA | If this is a problem (and I am assuming it is, or why else would you bother with these tubes...), has anyone thought of coating the string hole through the bridge with acrylic?
I use acrylic (liquid wood sealer, like used on hardwood floors...) for several purposes here and I think if there is powerderized wood residue getting into the string windings, it would be pretty easy to coat this area with acrylic.
I love this stuff and use it on artwork, wood projects and recently fixed a chip in the headstock of my Legend with it. It is a lot more forgiving than other wood products... can be completely removed with alcohol (if necesary...), is sandable and can be left glossy or made flat as required.
You could block the string hole (nearest the neck) and introduce acrylic (in small amounts...) down a piece of guitar string slightly smaller than the hole. The unsealed wood takes up the acrylic so fast that if you were careful you could completely coat this area in a couple of passes. This would also have the added benefit of hardening this area preventing future 'errosion'.
There are a lot of superior woodworkers here... Any of you have an opinion on this idea? |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | Why the hell would you go through all that when they make string tubes? I mean, I could move to Winnepeg, but that's why they invented suicide. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2010
Posts: 370
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba CANADA | I'm sure I have less guitars to restring than most of you do... just figured a once-and-for-all solution might be preferable to futzing around with little bits of tubing... over and over again.
The idea I suggested is not that different than guys taking their fretless basses and having the fretboards epoxied under pressure (to prevent wear...). I know people that thought that was insane when it was first introduced, but I don't know anyone that plays fretless bass that wouldn't have it done now... if they can afford it.
Not that different really... Metal windings, soft wood... windings win every time. Or you can make the wood harder... It was just a suggestion.
As to your last comment... Winnipeg gets a lot of bad press. With the current state of the world, it's actually a pretty good place to be... |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | sorry, that was just a bad joke. I'm sure Winnipeg is.....fine. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | http://accessories.musiciansfriend.com/product/Big-Bends-String-Sle... |
|
| |
Helix's
