The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: "Ovation Guitars really don't get the respect they deserve!" - Alex Pepiak



Jump to page : 12
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Difference in pick thickness

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2006Message format
 
Francis
Posted 2006-04-13 4:55 PM (#258580)
Subject: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
December 2005
Posts: 37

Location: No Town, California
I'm conffused about the different pick thickness. I know that the thicker the pick I get a muddier sound. And the thinner the pick the more clearer sound i get. But I can't figure out which pick is right for me. I currently use a medium pick and sounds ok. I sometimes use a thick pick, but sounds more muddy. I use the dunlop picks and the fender picks. Just wondering if any of you have any suggestions?


Thanks alot.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
an4340
Posted 2006-04-13 5:05 PM (#258581 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
May 2003
Posts: 4389

Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands
Use lot's of picks till you find the one you're happy with. I'm happy with Dunlop "lucky 13"'s, I believe they are like the tolex picks. When primarily picking out single notes I use a thicker pick. When primarily strumming I'll use a thinner pick.

My favorite picks are the ones I get for free.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2006-04-13 5:22 PM (#258582 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
The thicker the pick, the less hard I need to strum. For me this means I break fewer strings from trying to be both a rhythm and percussion section. Sometimes I'll use a ridiculously thin pick for a fast, open strumming, because I want the pick noise as a percussive effect.

Mostly the free ones I get are about the thickness of a dime, have advertising on them and break really fast. And worth every penny I paid for them. Except for some that AFG sent me, which were both free and very nice indeed.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick endres
Posted 2006-04-13 5:25 PM (#258583 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
August 2005
Posts: 616

Location: cincinnati, ohio
There are two ways to look at it-- it all depends on your playing style. Most people think a .50 medium is the industry standard. A lot of pros have used the Herco Flex50 Gold pick. The heavier the pick, the easier it is to pick out individual notes-- but the downside is, your strumming sounds heavy and HORRIBLE! If you use a lighter pick, your strumming sounds nice and clean and airy, but you have a harder time picking out individual notes. I do a lot of fingerpicking, and when I strum I try to do "fingerstrumming" as much as possible-- hitting bass notes with the thumb and strumming with the index finger, or all the fingers depending on the style of the song. Some of the best guitarists in the business don't even OWN a pick; e.g., Lindsey Buckingham of Fleetwood Mac and Mark Knopfler of Dire Straits. Stephen Stills, one of my favorites, puts the bottom of his thumb over the side of his index finger as if he were holding a pick--only he doesn't have a pick-- and strums that way.

When I DO use picks, I use a special light gauge thumbpick from Fred Kelly (check them out at http://www.guitarsessions.com/oct04/accessories.html); they're yellow (and if you look at them from underneath, it looks like somebody flippin' the bird!). These are a good compromise. They're fairly light for strumming (and they're FAST) but you can still pick notes. If I want something even faster, I'll sacrifice one of these picks by clipping off the pick tab, putting a piece of velcro on the thumbpick and a mating piece of velcro on a light-gauge regular pick (like a Dunlop .38 or .46) and mount the thin regular pick on the thumbpick. This works great for straight rhythm songs (like a lot of Eagles tunes and Lightfoot's "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald."

In the end, like most things, ya gotta experiment and find what works best for you. I like the thumbpicks because I have trouble holding on to regular picks-- problem solved!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MWoody
Posted 2006-04-13 5:36 PM (#258584 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness



Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 13996

Location: Upper Left USA
OFC whiteys!

You need a pocket full at all times.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Standingovation
Posted 2006-04-13 5:41 PM (#258585 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness



Joined:
June 2002
Posts: 6202

Location: Phoenix AZ
Originally posted by MWoody:
OFC whiteys!
Maybe "OFC Picks Lacking Color" would be a more politically correct way to say it ...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2006-04-13 5:51 PM (#258586 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
I usually keep about six pics (two each of three different thicknesses) on my mic stand and change-up depending on the tune we're doing and which guitar I'm using . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2006-04-13 6:01 PM (#258587 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15677

Location: SoCal
Fender mediums (or OFC cream colored -- same pics) for everything, steel string, 12 string, nylon string.

I'm in a rut.

Francis, where in Calif are you?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Capo Guy
Posted 2006-04-13 6:06 PM (#258588 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness



Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 4394

Location: East Tennessee
I don't use picks that often.

When I do I use Dunlop nylon .67mm.

They're blue and when not in use they look cool stuck in the strings at the second fret. :cool: :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2006-04-13 6:38 PM (#258589 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
It's not so much about thickness, it's about stiffness. Now before this degenerates into innuendo (Innuendo incidentally is an Italian enema) Thin, stiff picks sound great, they have excellent articulation, dynamics and clarity. The problem is that the best picks of this type are made from real tortoisehell which is illegal, and it's difficult to make a thin rigid pick from synthetic materials, though the Dunlop Ultex is pretty damn good. The material plays a part but generally thin flexible picks are easier to use but have very poor volume and dynamic range compared to stiff picks. Thick picks have a much greater dynamic range but lose some sparkle and inexperienced players tend to struggle with them. I rarely use picks except for rhythm parts when I'm recording but I managed to get a shit load of totally illegal tortoiseshell pics when I was at the Music China trade fair in Shanghai a while ago. These picks are absolutely rigid, incredibly thin and for me nothing else comes even close. Those Chinese just don't care.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TWA
Posted 2006-04-13 6:57 PM (#258590 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 349

Location: Snellville, GA
Originally posted by moody, p.i.:
Fender mediums (or OFC cream colored -- same pics) for everything, steel string, 12 string, nylon string.
Moody, I agree...except for the nylon part...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2006-04-13 7:04 PM (#258591 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15677

Location: SoCal
I know. Most people here get on me for using a pick with a nylon string guitar. Old habits die hard.....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick endres
Posted 2006-04-13 7:37 PM (#258592 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
August 2005
Posts: 616

Location: cincinnati, ohio
I pulled a Waskel and did an enhanced search when I got home. Fred Kelly has his own website:
http://www.fredkellypicks.com. My computer at work, for all its state-of-the-art programs and high speed connections, didn't pull that up. I use the light-gauge speedpicks (the yellow ones). This is an alternative to using regular pikcs-- I'm just too clumsy with them, even though I've been playing almost 40 years.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mark in Boise
Posted 2006-04-13 7:37 PM (#258593 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 12759

Location: Boise, Idaho
If Buckingham and Knopfler don't use picks, maybe I'll forget about trying to use them. I haven't bought one in 30 years. All that I have came with a guitar I bought and I rarely use them.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
alpep
Posted 2006-04-13 7:40 PM (#258594 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 10583

Location: NJ
does anyone remember the guy that made the wood picks? I think he was in florida. I thought they were rather cool and still use one unfortunately he did not take well to my critique of his product.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
fillhixx
Posted 2006-04-13 7:46 PM (#258595 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness



Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 4832

Location: Campbell River, British Columbia
I had the stone min'd pick once upon a time. Only thing it was perfect for was the intro chord smashing on Joan Armatradings 'I'm Lucky.'

Though it was a slippery little bugger and tended to fly like... well, a rock... at regular intervals.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TWA
Posted 2006-04-13 7:49 PM (#258596 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 349

Location: Snellville, GA
Doesn't Brian May use a coin to get that Queen steel sound?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2006-04-13 9:18 PM (#258597 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
No, he uses a homemade guitar and a preamp made from a car radio...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2006-04-13 9:30 PM (#258598 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
". . It's not so much about thickness, it's about stiffness . ."


. . . . .


. . . . .


. . . . .


. . . . ehhhh, . . . . never mind . . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Francis
Posted 2006-04-13 10:00 PM (#258599 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
December 2005
Posts: 37

Location: No Town, California
Thanks guy. I can always count on you for advise and learn a few thing here and there. Oh, and moody, pi, Im' here in Fresno........ :)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BruDeV
Posted 2006-04-14 12:29 AM (#258600 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
January 2003
Posts: 1498

Location: San Bernardino, California
TWA - Billy Gibbons of ZZ Top uses a Peso.

I usually use a Clayton Ultem pick or a brass one that I made myself (has a real sharp point).
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TWA
Posted 2006-04-14 7:49 AM (#258601 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 349

Location: Snellville, GA
I read somewhere years ago that Brian uses a nickel or similar coin to get some of his effects.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TWA
Posted 2006-04-14 7:59 AM (#258602 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 349

Location: Snellville, GA
I found this on Wikipedia...In addition to using his homemade guitar, he (Brian May) prefers to use coins (especially sixpenny pieces) instead of a more traditional plastic plectrum, on the basis that their rigidity gives him more control in playing. He is known to constantly carry coins in his pockets specifically for this purpose...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Designzilla
Posted 2006-04-14 9:41 AM (#258603 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 2150

Location: Orlando, FL
When I was younger I used thin and medium picks. These days I prefer a nice heavy pick. I like the control and the sound better. I find it easier to do hybrid picking with a heavier pick as well.

Some of those Fred Kelly picks look interesting, especially the bumlebee and the speed pick. I might have to try them. Thanks Rick!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Steve
Posted 2006-04-14 10:16 AM (#258604 - in reply to #258580)
Subject: Re: Difference in pick thickness


Joined:
July 2002
Posts: 1900

Tortex orange for everything acoustic- strummming, lead, fingericking, rolls. And a Fender jazz pick for everything electric.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclubâ„¢ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)