|
| ||
| The Ovation Fan Club | ||
| ||
| Random quote: "Got time to breathe, got time for music." --Briscoe Darling. |
nylon string & classic
| View previous thread :: View next thread | |
| Members Forums -> General Posting | Message format | |
| PEZ |
| ||
Joined: July 2003 Posts: 3111 Location: Nashville TN. | Opinions on These over the years Which was better 1970's, 1980's, 1990's or the current lx & classical? | ||
| |||
| bvince |
| ||
Joined: September 2005 Posts: 3619 Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :) | Wow! That's one I don't feel qualified to comment on. | ||
| |||
| moody, p.i. |
| ||
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 15680 Location: SoCal | It's a personal preference thing. Do you want a cutaway? Which preamp? 1 7/8" neck vs. 2"? Deep, SSB or shallow? Gloss neck or satin finish? Personal preference...... | ||
| |||
| Gallerinski |
| ||
| Joined: May 2008 Posts: 4996 Location: Phoenix AZ | Lots of variables. I guess I'd give the write in vote to my 60's shiny bowl classical !!! I dunno, I guess I've probably owned most of those. Never got warmed up to the Ovation classical sound. The proverbial "great plugged in" syndrome. My pick would probably be a modern day 2773-LX due to 1) neck width, and 2) contour bowl. | ||
| |||
| PEZ |
| ||
Joined: July 2003 Posts: 3111 Location: Nashville TN. | Mid bowl or deep perfer no cut. No contour (I hated the one I had) Maybe a better way of saying it is how did the different top & bracing sound. | ||
| |||
| MWoody |
| ||
Joined: December 2003 Posts: 13996 Location: Upper Left USA | PEZ, Shoot me a line - I have a 6773LX you can try for the cost of shipping... course it gets more expensive once you try it and have to keep it! | ||
| |||
| Gallerinski |
| ||
| Joined: May 2008 Posts: 4996 Location: Phoenix AZ | Originally posted by PEZ: Various degrees of mediocre. Maybe a better way of saying it is how did the different top & bracing sound. If you want a non cutaway you're going to be limited to deep bowl 1113/1613 and 1116/1616. | ||
| |||
| moody, p.i. |
| ||
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 15680 Location: SoCal | Originally posted by PEZ: What do you want to use it for?Opinions on These over the years Which was better 1970's, 1980's, 1990's or the current lx & classical? | ||
| |||
| 2ifbyC |
| ||
| Joined: December 2006 Posts: 6268 Location: Florida Central Gulf Coast | Originally posted by Gallerinski: Totally agree! Although I don't have one, I have had the chance to keep one during an 'Iffy Beauty Treatment' for an acquaintance.I guess I'd give the write in vote to my 60's shiny bowl classical !!! | ||
| |||
| Gallerinski |
| ||
| Joined: May 2008 Posts: 4996 Location: Phoenix AZ | Yeah, the original had a "zing" to them. Almost like the later ones had way too much bracing or something. Of course talent has a lot to do with it as well. I've played $5k-$7k real classicals and seems like they ALL sound mediocre in my hands. Personal shout-out to the Tak TF132SC. For around 500 or so used these are really nice classicals both plugged and unplugged. I think Cliff and I had both used this model on some of the OFC-CD tunes. The cooltube combined with the nylon strings is great. I also very much like Moody's custom 1773LX. Very beautiful. | ||
| |||
| PEZ |
| ||
Joined: July 2003 Posts: 3111 Location: Nashville TN. | Originally posted by moody, p.i.: Slow country balladsOriginally posted by PEZ: What do you want to use it for? Opinions on These over the years Which was better 1970's, 1980's, 1990's or the current lx & classical? | ||
| |||
| moody, p.i. |
| ||
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 15680 Location: SoCal | Plugged in or acoustically? | ||
| |||
| Joe Rotax |
| ||
Joined: February 2008 Posts: 747 | These guys seem to be getting by OK with crude instruments back before we had colour TV. Amazing the amount of attack and percussion they get out of those things http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYThXkntvek&feature=related | ||
| |||
| twistedlim |
| ||
Joined: November 2008 Posts: 1119 Location: Michigan | Originally posted by Gallerinski: Yea, you should hear how I can make my 12 string squeek.Of course talent has a lot to do with it as well. I've played $5k-$7k real classicals and seems like they ALL sound mediocre in my hands. | ||
| |||
| Capo Guy |
| ||
Joined: December 2004 Posts: 4394 Location: East Tennessee | I'll vote for the Country Artist. Late 70's -early 80's. | ||
| |||
| moody, p.i. |
| ||
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 15680 Location: SoCal | PEZ, you never said whether you wanted to mostly plug in or play acoustically. If acoustically, there's a 1763 on the 'bay right now. It's priced a bit high, but it's the guitar you want. If you're going to play a mixture of plugged in and acoustically, get a 1773LX. Pretty decent acoustic sound, great plugged in. If you're going to go mostly with plugged in, get an older country artist.... | ||
| |||
| Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page] |
| Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
| This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way. | |
| (Delete all cookies set by this site) | |

nylon string & classic