The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: "Believe me when I say that some of the most amazing music in history was made on equipment that's not as good as what you own right now." - Jol Dantzig



Jump to page : 12
Now viewing page 2 [25 messages per page]
Multi-Soundholes, bass side only

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2004-2005Message format
 
Paul Templeman
Posted 2005-06-22 12:24 PM (#147048 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
The shape of the soundhole is pretty much an aesthetic consideration, on oval hole or round hole, or for that matter a cluster of holes wont make much of a difference tonally as long as the size is a constant. Placement is another issue, moving the hole/holes away from the centre of the top allows for a greater area of soundboard to vibrate. The Shape of the box can be another variable, in that boxes with parallel surfaces (eg dreadnoughts) can promote standing waves whose frequencies are related directly to the box dimensions. The lack of parallel surfaces in an Ovation bowl will distribute the standing waves more evenly. I've often thought that this could be one of the factors that contributes to Ovations signature sound.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Strummin12
Posted 2005-06-22 12:54 PM (#147049 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 623

Location: Lake Hiawatha, New Jersey
Interesting to me...last year prior to the new MEII1598 coming out (which is the newer version of the Melissa Etheridge 12 string Adamas with one set of soundholes) I saw Melissa's ME1598 (original ruby version) very close up. The soundholes on the treble (string) side were plugged in with wood painted flat black to seal 'em up, in order to sound closer to the newer model...and still not be so obvious. Apparantly she was not 'ready' yet to play the new one publicly, so she modded the old one for performances in the meantime.

Anyway...

Johnny
Top of the page Bottom of the page
schroeder
Posted 2005-06-22 3:29 PM (#147050 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 4413

On several upmarket guitars (and I do mean UPmarket - John Montleone and several classical makers) they offer a port in the side - top shoulder - so that the player hears what the audience hears. It doesn't appear to affect the front projection at all, although nobody's ever let me play one to find out.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2005-06-23 7:03 AM (#147051 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
Originally posted by Waskel:
[/qb]
Ooooohkay. I guess what I'm asking is (in your opinion) would the multi-hole top with the 12 fret neck be likely to have as good of bass response as the single hole with the 12 fret neck? [/QB]

My guess would be that they'd sound pretty similar, all things being equal, which they rarely are.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
an4340
Posted 2005-06-23 7:39 AM (#147052 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
May 2003
Posts: 4389

Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands
So the removal of the lower bout soundholes increases the base response while decreasing the treble response. From the above, I get the vibe that most people want to give up some high end for more bass. I'm stickin' to my preferences though, holes on both sides for pure acoustic playing and holes on one side for amplified.

PS: Thanks for the explanation PT
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2005-06-23 9:22 AM (#147053 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Originally posted by Paul Templeman:
My guess would be that they'd sound pretty similar, all things being equal, which they rarely are.
Paul, I was going to tell you that you make a lot more sense when you type than you do when you talk.

Now I'm not so sure.

Have you ever considered politics? :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bauerhillboy
Posted 2005-06-24 6:39 AM (#147054 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
February 2004
Posts: 1634

Location: Warren,Pa.
Paul, Sometime I wouldn't mind reading a post with a more thorough explanation of the Helmholtz frequency. I know I'll get comments about being a geek, but I'll also bet I'm not the only one who wants to hear more. Maybe a link to save you some time...but then it's fun to hear it in YOUR words. Tks, John <>{ P.S.- Thanks for being so kind to Lisa on the tour. That was her first time rubbing elbows with the BIG guys and she's got enough inspiration to move her playing 10 levels higher.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2005-06-24 7:54 AM (#147055 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
John;

If you do a search in the archives for "Helmholtz"
(narrowing the search down by searching only Master Templeman's post - by entering his Member #), you'll find a quite nifty, descriptive post that he did a couple years ago (if I remember correctly) . . . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2005-06-24 9:34 AM (#147056 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
John, I pulled these off the post Cliff mentioned

http://www.hesston.edu/academic/faculty/nelsonk/PhysicsResearch/Gui...

http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/211.web.stuff/billington/air.html

they explain some of the acoustic physics of guitars in relatively simple terms
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bauerhillboy
Posted 2005-06-24 5:35 PM (#147057 - in reply to #147023)
Subject: Re: Multi-Soundholes, bass side only


Joined:
February 2004
Posts: 1634

Location: Warren,Pa.
By "relatively simple" I take it to mean you think even I could grasp it.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 2 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclubâ„¢ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)