|
|
Joined:
June 2008
Posts: 129
Location: UK | Hi, has anyone got one of the above for sale please? Thanks |
|
| |
|
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 2985
Location: Sydney, Australia | There's a shallow bowl 12 String Adamas II on eBay.
But seems a bit strange to me, one of the reasons for the booming sound of the texture top Adamii was the deep bowl. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 498
| you'd be surprised how good the 1885s sound, I hate to say it Richard, but that shallow bowl textured top would have your w597 cowering in a corner.
the 1885 is a really nice TT Adamas, and that is a more than fair price.
Glenn |
|
| |
|
Joined:
October 2006
Posts: 5575
Location: big island | leslie, the seller, is also a member here with the username "vision". she's a wonderful lady. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains | leslie, the seller, is also a member here with the username "vision". she's a wonderful lady. Yes she is!
And the guitar is a great one: I used to own a black one in the late 90's...this is a rare color and a great price! |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2008
Posts: 179
Location: Central Florida | Originally posted by Malabar Glenn:
you'd be surprised how good the 1885s sound, I hate to say it Richard, but that shallow bowl textured top would have your w597 cowering in a corner. Unplugged or plugged, Glenn? I'm playing with the idea of a 12 string but don't know squat about shallow bowls. Especially Adamas.
Does a shallow bowl Adamas sound full acoustically or is the 1885 more of a "plugged in" model? Of course this is a subjective question but I am interested in how people who have played one feel about the sound.
Any others here who may have experience with the 1885 and would share an opinion on the(acoustic) sound?
Otto
. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
November 2007
Posts: 1486
Location: Cincinnati | Otto,
I have an 1881, and while it can't keep up with the 1581, it still sounds great unplugged. |
|
| |
Still wanted - Adamas II 1685 12 string
