|
|
 Joined: September 2006 Posts: 10777
Location: Keepin' It Weird in Portland, OR |
EvilBay - No BIN but Free Shipping. :eek: (not Mine) |
|
| |
|
 Joined: July 2003 Posts: 3111
Location: Nashville TN. | Wow neat!!! |
|
| |
|
Joined: June 2006 Posts: 7307
Location: South of most, North of few | That one's been on the bay before. May be a relist. |
|
| |
|
 Joined: April 2004 Posts: 13303
Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066 | Was that a factory one-off paint job or an after market paint job?
Kinda cool. |
|
| |
|
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 14842
Location: NJ | Not crazy 'bout it . . .
The CONCEPT is good, but the execution's a bit lacking.
Looks like it should be on '76 Chevy van with a porthole window . . . |
|
| |
|
 Joined: August 2002 Posts: 8307
Location: Tennessee | Sammy Johns signature edition. |
|
| |
|
 Joined: January 2002 Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | aftermarket paint. |
|
| |
|
Joined: March 2007 Posts: 843
Location: CA | Painting the tops of guitars is an interesting concept. Most times, I think it detracts from the look and value of the guitar, but I must admit I've seen a few pretty nice jobs.
But a question if I may: Wouldn't paint detract from the sound? Maybe not on this example if it was airbrushed over the original finish. But someone mentioned a Chevy Van motif here (I agree — seems like there should be a voluptuous half-naked babe in chainmail somewhere). The way car guys normally do it is to airbrush the artwork, then spray with a clearcoat — which seems like it could be really detrimental to the tonal qualities of an acoustic guitar. I imagine you can pretty much do anything to a solid-body electric that you wanted. But not an acoustic. Opinions? |
|
| |