The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: “Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything.” -Plato



Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
what makes "acoustic" equipment different?

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2002-2003Message format
 
Nils
Posted 2003-07-25 1:36 AM (#206196)
Subject: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 1380

Location: Central Oregon
This acoustic/electric business has me puzzled. Can anyone tell me the difference between an "acoustic amp" & a regular amp? I haven't been able to figure that one out. I would also like to know the difference between a ZOOM 504 "acoustic" pedal & the ZOOM 505. I have a 505 & a dinky little Gorilla amp that I've been playing my three main guitars through here at home- my old 175, my Elite 12 string & my Epiphone Riviera (335 clone). They actually all sound good to me, considering. Then again I'm half deaf so that might be why they all sound ok. Unfortunately the Gorilla is dying, one function at a time. It's a sick little monkey.
It looks like I may be buying a new (small) amp before too long & I'd like to have a better idea what I'm looking for. Any insight would be appreciated.

Nils
Top of the page Bottom of the page
grrroovedude
Posted 2003-07-25 2:36 AM (#206197 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
February 2003
Posts: 299

Location: Netherlands
I think it has to do with their frequency response.

Keyboard amps are supposed to have a flat frequency response, e.g. they don't color the sound.

Guitar (pre-)amps (electric) have a frequency response which boosts mids and cuts lows and highs (that's why you have a guitar amp and don't play thru a hifi amp).

I suppose Acousic amps have another frequency response.

I would suggest to consider buying a digital amp like the Line6 Equipment, because it gives you the choice of different amps.

I play my acoustic and electric guitars thru a Boss GT-3 effects processor with a built in amp simulator (about 8 models, inc. an acoustic preamp) and then run it thru the poweramp of a Bedrock BC-50. It's a very cheap and very good sounding option if you take the time to create good patches.

Also see my reply on the Innovator -New ovation owner thread.

Martin
Top of the page Bottom of the page
alpep
Posted 2003-07-25 7:11 AM (#206198 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 10583

Location: NJ
roland JC 120 makes a good acoustic amp also. it is clean and bright sounding. for electric guitar clean is not what the average player wants unless they are playing jazz. most of the ss amps will make a good acoustic amp also
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Robby_dup1
Posted 2003-07-25 8:52 AM (#206199 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
July 2003
Posts: 18

Location: The Great State of Texas
Well, it's certainly not a small amp Nils (it must weigh 65-70 lbs.), but I've been playing through a Roland AC-100 for about 3 years and it produces a really nice warm, clean sound with no noise. Has a built-in notch filter, chorus, reverb. Plus, it has a second channel with both 1/4" and XLR inputs to run either a second guitar or mic for solo gigs. I think it's a 12" with 2 5" horns.

I tried the Fender Acoustasonic Jr, but didn't like the average low-end response as much as the big Roland. I did like the chorus on the Fender better, but if you're running outboard effects it's no big deal.

As for "acoustic" gear vs. "electric" gear, I've come to realize that there's a whole lot of people building products who are a hell of a lot smarter than me, so I just go with what sounds good to me.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2003-07-25 9:42 AM (#206200 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
Remember that most "acoustic" amplifiers are intended as personal monitors rather than stand alone "backline" amplification, that's why most have balanced outputs so they can be DI'd into the FOH. Acoustic amps generally have small cabinets & small (6-8 inch) speakers. These will not develop the lower frequencies as efficiently as a 12 or 15 inch speaker in a larger enclosure. No pain, no gain with sound equipment I'm afraid,

The principle difference between amps designed for electric guitars & amps designed for acoustic guitars is, as grooove said, frequency response. Electric guitar amplifiers and speakers have a deliberately limited & coloured frequency response (there are exceptions, such as the JC120 as Al pointed out) Acoustic instruments require amplification with a wide flat frequency response. Basically acoustic amps are small PA systems. A keyboard amp, as has been suggested, will usually do a good job, but look out for those with an HF horn. If you're fussy about you sound I would not recommend any multi-FX unit designed for electric guitars for use with electro-acoustics
Top of the page Bottom of the page
alpep
Posted 2003-07-25 10:29 AM (#206201 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 10583

Location: NJ
it's all in the eq
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2003-07-25 10:33 AM (#206202 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
EQ is not a cure-all and cannot compensate for impedance mis-matches or speakers with a limited frequency response.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
alpep
Posted 2003-07-25 11:31 AM (#206203 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 10583

Location: NJ
Originally posted by Paul Templeman:
EQ is not a cure-all and cannot compensate for impedance mis-matches or speakers with a limited frequency response.


paul that is correct but to work with what you have you need to adjust the eq to what sounds best.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Nils
Posted 2003-07-25 2:14 PM (#206204 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 1380

Location: Central Oregon
Thanks guys. Now I know a lot more than I did. When the monkey dies I'll probably just ask Steven to get me a small acoustic amp. I really don't need much, anything that covers the constant ringing in my ears sounds good to me.

Nils
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bailey
Posted 2003-07-26 1:39 AM (#206205 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
May 2002
Posts: 3005

Location: Las Cruces, NM
This may be a good place to ask a question, my daughter, divorced, and an owner of a Yamaha acoustic electric nice sounding guitar, and a very nice Fender Mustang, brought to my house to keep for her a Carvin 60 watt, X-AMP tube amp that she had bought in the 80's that sounds great with my Viper when the Overdrive is kicked in. Her ex, offered her $100 for it if she would ship it to him ($25 of the $100 was to cover the cost of shipping) Is this a good deal for her? Or should I hang on to the amp and check it out?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BruDeV
Posted 2003-07-26 10:10 AM (#206206 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
January 2003
Posts: 1498

Location: San Bernardino, California
I've seen them going for $200-$300 on ebay.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bailey
Posted 2003-07-27 2:28 AM (#206207 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
May 2002
Posts: 3005

Location: Las Cruces, NM
Thanks BruDev

I'll hang on to it for a while, it is a great sounding amp, and I plugged in my keyboard and it sounded great there also.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
F.Bailey
Posted 2003-08-04 12:59 AM (#206208 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
July 2003
Posts: 34

Location: Yerington,NV
I play my o thru an ampeg svt bass head with a a.r.t. tube preamp.My first job as a bass player,Guitar for at home to write songs with.I haven't spent the money on a acoustic amp yet but I've been looking.
Frank
p.s. Bailey if your going to sell that amp head,let me know!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bailey
Posted 2003-08-05 1:47 AM (#206209 - in reply to #206196)
Subject: Re: what makes "acoustic" equipment different?


Joined:
May 2002
Posts: 3005

Location: Las Cruces, NM
F. Bailey

It isn't an amp head, it's an amp with a 12" Celestion speaker. I downloaded a manual from the Carvin site and what it is is a 2 channel amp, clean for rythym and distorted for lead. If I could find a foot pedal I could switch between modes, it has 2 levels of distortion and the manual shows settings to emulate a "Marshall" sound, and a "Boogie" sound. I guess an early version of the Zoom amp simulator as my daughter bought it new in the early 80's and it appears to not have been played since. I tried those settings last night with my Viper and it really cranks. I noticed that Carvin is putting Celestion speakers in their new "vintage" amps.

Bailey
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclub™ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)