| ||
The Ovation Fan Club | ||
| ||
Random quote: "One good thing about music, when it hits you, you feel no pain." - Bob Marley |
Multi-Soundholes, bass side only
| View previous thread :: View next thread | |
Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2004-2005 | Message format |
Paul Templeman |
| ||
Joined: February 2002 Posts: 5750 Location: Scotland | The shape of the soundhole is pretty much an aesthetic consideration, on oval hole or round hole, or for that matter a cluster of holes wont make much of a difference tonally as long as the size is a constant. Placement is another issue, moving the hole/holes away from the centre of the top allows for a greater area of soundboard to vibrate. The Shape of the box can be another variable, in that boxes with parallel surfaces (eg dreadnoughts) can promote standing waves whose frequencies are related directly to the box dimensions. The lack of parallel surfaces in an Ovation bowl will distribute the standing waves more evenly. I've often thought that this could be one of the factors that contributes to Ovations signature sound. | ||
Strummin12 |
| ||
Joined: August 2002 Posts: 623 Location: Lake Hiawatha, New Jersey | Interesting to me...last year prior to the new MEII1598 coming out (which is the newer version of the Melissa Etheridge 12 string Adamas with one set of soundholes) I saw Melissa's ME1598 (original ruby version) very close up. The soundholes on the treble (string) side were plugged in with wood painted flat black to seal 'em up, in order to sound closer to the newer model...and still not be so obvious. Apparantly she was not 'ready' yet to play the new one publicly, so she modded the old one for performances in the meantime. Anyway... Johnny | ||
schroeder |
| ||
Joined: November 2004 Posts: 4413 | On several upmarket guitars (and I do mean UPmarket - John Montleone and several classical makers) they offer a port in the side - top shoulder - so that the player hears what the audience hears. It doesn't appear to affect the front projection at all, although nobody's ever let me play one to find out. | ||
Paul Templeman |
| ||
Joined: February 2002 Posts: 5750 Location: Scotland | Originally posted by Waskel: Ooooohkay. I guess what I'm asking is (in your opinion) would the multi-hole top with the 12 fret neck be likely to have as good of bass response as the single hole with the 12 fret neck? [/QB] [/qb] My guess would be that they'd sound pretty similar, all things being equal, which they rarely are. | ||
an4340 |
| ||
Joined: May 2003 Posts: 4389 Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands | So the removal of the lower bout soundholes increases the base response while decreasing the treble response. From the above, I get the vibe that most people want to give up some high end for more bass. I'm stickin' to my preferences though, holes on both sides for pure acoustic playing and holes on one side for amplified. PS: Thanks for the explanation PT | ||
Waskel |
| ||
Joined: February 2005 Posts: 11840 Location: closely held secret | Originally posted by Paul Templeman: Paul, I was going to tell you that you make a lot more sense when you type than you do when you talk. My guess would be that they'd sound pretty similar, all things being equal, which they rarely are. Now I'm not so sure. Have you ever considered politics? :D | ||
bauerhillboy |
| ||
Joined: February 2004 Posts: 1634 Location: Warren,Pa. | Paul, Sometime I wouldn't mind reading a post with a more thorough explanation of the Helmholtz frequency. I know I'll get comments about being a geek, but I'll also bet I'm not the only one who wants to hear more. Maybe a link to save you some time...but then it's fun to hear it in YOUR words. Tks, John <>{ P.S.- Thanks for being so kind to Lisa on the tour. That was her first time rubbing elbows with the BIG guys and she's got enough inspiration to move her playing 10 levels higher. | ||
cliff |
| ||
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 14842 Location: NJ | John; If you do a search in the archives for "Helmholtz" (narrowing the search down by searching only Master Templeman's post - by entering his Member #), you'll find a quite nifty, descriptive post that he did a couple years ago (if I remember correctly) . . . . . | ||
Paul Templeman |
| ||
Joined: February 2002 Posts: 5750 Location: Scotland | John, I pulled these off the post Cliff mentioned http://www.hesston.edu/academic/faculty/nelsonk/PhysicsResearch/Gui... http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/211.web.stuff/billington/air.html they explain some of the acoustic physics of guitars in relatively simple terms | ||
bauerhillboy |
| ||
Joined: February 2004 Posts: 1634 Location: Warren,Pa. | By "relatively simple" I take it to mean you think even I could grasp it. | ||
Jump to page : 1 2 Now viewing page 2 [25 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way. | |
(Delete all cookies set by this site) | |