|
|
Joined: August 2007 Posts: 494
Location: Location Location Location | How do the 30th Anniversary reissues compare with the originals? |
|
|
|
 Joined: August 2003 Posts: 4619
Location: SoCal | 1687 RI...personally, I believe the pre-amp that came with the reissues is better than the original. As to the guitar, I have two early 1687's and the RI is a match. The factory did an excellent job.
As to the blue finish/color, the older guitars may have faded but the RI definitely has a darker finish. This is evident on others such as my two 12's and others I have seen that came out of the factory since ? 1990.
Overall, same/same...a classic, new or old. |
|
|
|
Joined: January 2005 Posts: 4903
Location: Phoenix AZ | The reissues are real close to the originals. In some cases maybe a tad better, in others maybe lacking a little of the original mojo. But all in all they are fine instruments and every bit worthy of the name.
Dave |
|
|
|
 Joined: January 2002 Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | real good, real good. |
|
|
|
Joined: October 2003 Posts: 134
Location: Lakewood, Ohio | Gee when Martin does a reissue they usually substitute Indian for Brazilian rosewood. Are the bowls the same formula/wieght on the RI? |
|
|
|
Joined: February 2004 Posts: 2487
| Reissues cost more. Electronics are better. but you can have new electronics installed in an older one for a lot less than the differnce in price and you get a classic that will have a better collectors value like any good American made guitar. The older the guitar is the better the resale.
Just not this week apparently.
Randy |
|
|