|
|
Joined: April 2009 Posts: 130
Location: London, UK | I have no words..
eBay UK item |
|
|
|
Joined: January 2009 Posts: 4535
Location: Flahdaw | "with a make-over to the top, giving it a slightly organic look"........vomit's organic, right? |
|
|
|
Joined: April 2009 Posts: 130
Location: London, UK | "The guitar is probably very 'collectable' to an Ovation enthusiast."
I'm assuming the word 'collectable' in quotes has a meaning I am unfamiliar with. |
|
|
|
Joined: January 2002 Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | it's a 1612, and a phucked one at that. |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2009 Posts: 686
Location: Route 66, just east of the Cadillac Ranch | Also came in a double neck version.
|
|
|
|
Joined: November 2005 Posts: 4832
Location: Campbell River, British Columbia | Gee, I kinda like it.
IF it still plays well, I bet you'd
get any extra $40-$50 a day playing that
out front of the liquor store. |
|
|
|
Joined: February 2002 Posts: 5750
Location: Scotland | Originally posted by Beal:
it's a 1612, and a phucked one at that. It certainly appears to be a 1612, but in the pic that shows the back it appears to have Stereo electronics like the Legend Ltd. Never seen that on a 1612 before. |
|
|
|
Joined: August 2002 Posts: 8307
Location: Tennessee | You have a good point, Paul. Did they ever put foil labels into 1612s, because that's what's in there? The text in the listing says it's a 1619-4 which would make it a Custom Legend (right?) but there's no abalone around the body nor a 5 piece neck. I've got the feeling it's a frankenstein. |
|
|
|
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 15665
Location: SoCal | All Ovations in the 70's had foil labels.
I agree with Temp. Looks like a Custom Balladeer. Might have been mislabeled (1612 vs. 1619) but more likely the seller either thru a mistake or intentionally called a Custom Balladeer a Custom Legend...... |
|
|
|
Joined: January 2006 Posts: 5881
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains | That must be a really early model if it was used in Hank Williams' band (since he died in 1953). Could he have meant Jr.? |
|
|