The Ovation Fan Club
The Ovation Fan Club
Forum Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Albums | Language
Your are viewing as a Guest. ( logon | register )

Random quote: “Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything.” -Plato



Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?

View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums Archive -> The Vault: 2002-2003Message format
 
ovation06057
Posted 2002-10-20 6:19 AM (#217041)
Subject: any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?


Joined:
October 2002
Posts: 61

I was wondering if anyone had USA models with and without K-BARS in their necks And witch of the two they like more.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2002-10-20 8:29 AM (#217042 - in reply to #217041)
Subject: Re: any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15664

Location: SoCal
This is all very very subjective, persoanl opinion stuff.

I prefer an Ovation with a K bar, not for the K bar, but because it indicates a guitar built after about 1982, which also means A bracing, which I do prefer. To my ear, it has a more balanced tone with a better deep end than the various x and v bracing patterns used before.

Now, having said that, I know that there are folks here that love their 60's and 70's Ovations. As I said, this is very very subjective.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff
Posted 2002-10-20 3:52 PM (#217043 - in reply to #217041)
Subject: Re: any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?


Joined:
June 2002
Posts: 863

Location: Central Florida
Like you say Paul, this is all very subjective, and just a personal observation based on my own collection of guitars, but it seems to me that the necks reinforced by the K-bar might age better in terms of staying true. I have an '83 Custom Legend and an '89 Elite with the K-bar and the necks on both are perfectly straight, and the action just as smooth as the day I got'em. On the other hand, the necks on my '68 Deluxe Balladeer and my '71 Glen Campbell seem to have "sunk in" just a bit, and require more effort in the fretting hand. Does this sound at all consistant with other's experience?

Jeff
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ovation06057
Posted 2002-10-20 5:29 PM (#217044 - in reply to #217041)
Subject: Re: any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?


Joined:
October 2002
Posts: 61

my kbar is the only guitar,that at any given time, is the only one that dose'nt need a neck adjustment when I pick it up.It seems that all my other guitars need to be re-straightened before it can be played as intended when new.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
musicamex
Posted 2002-10-20 5:50 PM (#217045 - in reply to #217041)
Subject: Re: any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 873

Location: puerto vallarta, mexico
i'm going to make an assumption based on my limited experience. k bar necks are adjusted through the soundhole with a 3/16 allen wrench. the older ones from a beneath a plate on the head with a 3/8 box wrench. for simple access on the fly and for applying penetrating oil to a stubborn nut, or for replacing the nut i prefer the old style. i havent had a problem with that type of neck. i am less comfortable and have had problems with the ones with the internal screw. it is harder to inspect, is harder to turn without a lever added to the short end of an allen wrench, and are difficult to oil. i have a guitar where this is buggered up from improper tool use and one that is frozed or too tight to turn comfortably. i like to see what i'm working on to prevent four letter flurries.

however i guess the head is stronger with the k bar and technically it works better and is probably less expensive to make.

bracing is another thing that in a timeline that improved with the newer style, but that is a whole different subject i know even less about.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2002-10-20 6:42 PM (#217046 - in reply to #217041)
Subject: Re: any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
I own several Ovations with both types of neck reinforcement, I think the earlier pegheds with the adjustment at the nut look better but are going to be more prone to a break at that point. I haven't had a problem with either type in terms of stability. The k-bar adjustment nut on my '78 Adamas is a bitch to get at, even with the correct wrench.

[ October 20, 2002: Message edited by: Paul Templeman ]
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bailey
Posted 2002-10-21 2:20 AM (#217047 - in reply to #217041)
Subject: Re: any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?


Joined:
May 2002
Posts: 3005

Location: Las Cruces, NM
The only complaint I have about my Viper is the simple neck is prone to whipping in the wind, exaggerated because it is 25 inch or whatever, the K bar might help.

Bailey
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cms-man
Posted 2002-10-22 3:01 PM (#217048 - in reply to #217041)
Subject: Re: any thoughts on K- BAR less O's?


Joined:
October 2002
Posts: 170

Location: The Shop
I hope they dont lose the k-bar!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

This message board and website is not sponsored or affiliated with Ovation® Guitars in any way.
Registered to: The Ovation Fanclub™ Copyright (c) 2001
free counters
(Delete all cookies set by this site)