Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?
guitarwannabee
Posted 2007-03-11 4:42 PM (#111010)
Subject: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 1487

Location: Michigan
Since we all know that Detroit is the best City for Rock & Roll which one is second???? GWB
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2007-03-11 4:46 PM (#111011 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Mt. Clemens
(sorry... inside joke for GWB)
.
Ask the bands that play Detroit.
Our past has a reputation of hard working blue collars who like to let loose. Our future?? Who knows.

City #2.... Cleveland?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Old Man Arthur
Posted 2007-03-11 4:49 PM (#111012 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
September 2006
Posts: 10777

Location: Keepin' It Weird in Portland, OR
Toss-up: San Francisco or Boston...
Or at least that's how it was...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
guitarwannabee
Posted 2007-03-11 4:53 PM (#111013 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 1487

Location: Michigan
Hey Brad we just got back from a nice drive from Harrison Twp to Marine City. Most likely went right by you.
It is a beautiful day for a drive
(Down By The River ). Pun intended.GWB
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2007-03-11 4:54 PM (#111014 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
If ya passed by the Colony Tower, ya passed by me.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
guitarwannabee
Posted 2007-03-11 5:03 PM (#111015 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 1487

Location: Michigan
Yes we did Brad
I will relate to the Colony Tower as Brads Pad.GWB
Top of the page Bottom of the page
an4340
Posted 2007-03-11 6:17 PM (#111016 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
May 2003
Posts: 4389

Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands
I've found each place has it's own distinctive flavor:Brooklyn, NY, most challenging; West coast of florida, from sarsota to tampa, the most relaxed; singapore, the dopiest, all imported from the Philippines, but the go-go dancers were entertaining.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Omaha
Posted 2007-03-11 6:55 PM (#111017 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 1126

Location: Omaha, NE
Seems like it shifts...Minneapolis had its run, so did Seattle. Los Angeles will always have its stuff. In the last few years, Omaha (thanks to Connor Oberst and the whole Saddle Creek records indie thing) has made something of a mark.

I think the message is that good stuff comes up everywhere. These days, all the cities look the same anyway.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2007-03-11 8:02 PM (#111018 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Originally posted by guitarwannabee:
Since we all know that Detroit is the best City for Rock & Roll which one is second????
This is a joke, right?

Oh, I don't know ... Liverpool ???
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2007-03-11 8:23 PM (#111019 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Liverpool is a one hit wonder.
But I will conceed that their one hit is a big one.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tommy M.
Posted 2007-03-11 9:21 PM (#111020 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2004
Posts: 627

Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
What about Gerry and the Pacemakers, another Liverpool band.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cholloway
Posted 2007-03-11 10:40 PM (#111021 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 2793

Location: Atlanta, GA.
CLEVELAND ROCKS!!!

After all, it is home to the R&R Hall of Fame.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
72tour
Posted 2007-03-11 11:23 PM (#111022 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
July 2006
Posts: 171

Location: Oregon
Cleveland definatly. I dislike Detroit with a passion. Stupid KISS moneymongers.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Designzilla
Posted 2007-03-11 11:48 PM (#111023 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 2150

Location: Orlando, FL
Whatever it is, it definitely ain't in Florida.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
an4340
Posted 2007-03-11 11:51 PM (#111024 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
May 2003
Posts: 4389

Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands
I've heard that the great norwest, focusing on seatle is a rock and roll cruicable.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
fillhixx
Posted 2007-03-12 1:44 AM (#111025 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 4833

Location: Campbell River, British Columbia
From what I'm hearing these days, it's Halifax!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stephent28
Posted 2007-03-12 1:57 PM (#111026 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303

Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066
AUSTIN
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tommy M.
Posted 2007-03-12 2:15 PM (#111027 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2004
Posts: 627

Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Cleavland has the R&R hall of fame, because of Alan Freed, and charity. I don't think I've ever heard of such a thing in music, as "the cleavland sound". Not many cities have the amount of venues for playing live music as Austin Tx. They also host the SXSW gathering each year. Austin gets my vote.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stephent28
Posted 2007-03-12 2:24 PM (#111028 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303

Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066
SXSW has become a national/worldwide event.

Tommy, you are a wise man ;)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2007-03-12 2:53 PM (#111029 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
too many Texans . . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stephent28
Posted 2007-03-12 2:57 PM (#111030 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303

Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066
Hey....Tommy M is from NJ. You have only yourselves to blame.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ProfessorBB
Posted 2007-03-12 3:24 PM (#111031 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 5881

Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2007-03-12 4:33 PM (#111032 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
Dubai.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tommy M.
Posted 2007-03-12 4:57 PM (#111033 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2004
Posts: 627

Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Dubai? Oil, not rock & roll. I think I could be objective on this, as Austin actually has more live music venues than cities 3 times its size. Los Angeles is a big recording center, and competes. San Francisco? I think we're talking about the present tense here.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2007-03-12 5:50 PM (#111034 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
I realize the questions was restricted to ROCK N ROLL. But if you open it up to ALL MUSIC, then there is no competition to NEW YORK CITY. Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
guitarwannabee
Posted 2007-03-12 6:10 PM (#111035 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 1487

Location: Michigan
Those are some great SECOND PLACE CHOICES .

# 1 DETROIT ROCKS. GWB
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2007-03-12 6:26 PM (#111036 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Originally posted by Tupperware:
... then there is no competition to NEW YORK CITY. Dave
Oh... of course.. "Cats", "Phantom", "Guys & Dolls", "Joseph & the Technicolor Dreamcoat"...
How could I have missed that.
.
Perhaps you're thinking of New York as the birthplace of punk? New York Dolls, Blondie, Sex Pistols?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Old Applause Owner
Posted 2007-03-12 9:01 PM (#111037 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
July 2003
Posts: 1922

Location: Canton (Detroit), MI
Yep, Dee-troit is numero uno.....My vote for second place goes to Memphis.

Roger
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2007-03-12 9:18 PM (#111038 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
dit. dit. da. dit dit...
Breaking news.
Bob Seger has booked two nights at Cobo Hall in Detroit. That is where "Live Bullet" was recorded many years ago.
Well... it seems a though Seger is going to re-create that concert and record the shows for a possible release.
"Detroit...the home of Rock & Roll!! yeah"

Like em or not... Kiss recorded their live album at Cobo.
As well as J. Geils.
It was because of that Detroit crowd.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stephent28
Posted 2007-03-12 10:28 PM (#111039 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303

Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066
Originally posted by Slipkid:


Like em or not... Kiss recorded their live album at Cobo.
As well as J. Geils.
It was because of that Detroit crowd.
Rumour has it that both the guitar work and the crowd noise was overdubbed to make it more listenable. ;)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2007-03-13 12:17 AM (#111040 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Originally posted by Slipkid:
Originally posted by Tupperware:
... then there is no competition to NEW YORK CITY. Dave
Oh... of course.. "Cats", "Phantom", "Guys & Dolls", "Joseph & the Technicolor Dreamcoat"...
How could I have missed that.
My point was, if you want to call Detroit the home of RnR, fine. If you want to include all forms of music, then I would question that choice. NY Philharmonic, Julliard School, Carneige Hall, The Blue Note, The Bottom Line, MSG, The Met, Broadway ... I have the upmost respect for Kiss, Motown music and Cobo Hall.

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stonebobbo
Posted 2007-03-13 1:31 AM (#111041 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 8307

Location: Tennessee
Originally posted by Slipkid:
dit. dit. da. dit dit...
Breaking news.
Bob Seger has booked two nights at Cobo Hall in Detroit. That is where "Live Bullet" was recorded many years ago.
Well... it seems a though Seger is going to re-create that concert and record the shows for a possible release.
"Detroit...the home of Rock & Roll!! yeah"
I truly, truly hope not. Live Bullet can not be re-created. The only Bullet from that time that is still with it is Alto Reed. It would be like Paul and Ringo getting together to remake Sgt. Pepper's.

I saw Seger and "the Silver Bullet Band" a couple of weeks back as a favor to lady stonebobbo. Decent show, but steeped in all the old stuff. Not my bag. Just an arena full of old, fat people wanting to hear "Old Time Rock and Roll", a song whose message I never connected with. When he launched into it, the place went nuts and everyone stood up dancing (in the way only old, fat white people can). I about threw up.

The week before that, lady stonebobbo humored me and joined me for a Smithereens show in SF. 500 people smashed into a small club. Everybody sweating and gyrating mere inches apart. No light shows, no stage decorations ... just two electric guitars, a bass and drums kicking it for close to three hours. That's what rock and roll is all about.

I've always been partial to the bands that come out of Jersey and Boston. They seem to relate to the people the best.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2007-03-13 8:13 AM (#111042 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
Bobbo... ever consider writing reviews for a music rag?

I whole-heartedly agree about "Jersey Bands" there are so many great ones.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cruster
Posted 2007-03-13 8:23 AM (#111043 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
May 2004
Posts: 2850

Location: Midland, MI
Originally posted by stonebobbo:
...Just an arena full of old, fat people wanting to hear "Old Time Rock and Roll", a song whose message I never connected with. When he launched into it, the place went nuts and everyone stood up dancing (in the way only old, fat white people can). I about threw up.
I have never understood the appeal of that song, either. Just not my flavor of ice cream, I guess.

The week before that, lady stonebobbo humored me and joined me for a Smithereens show in SF. 500 people smashed into a small club. Everybody sweating and gyrating mere inches apart. No light shows, no stage decorations ... just two electric guitars, a bass and drums kicking it for close to three hours. That's what rock and roll is all about.
Those are the shows I prefer. I've done the arena rock shows (Tull, Floyd, Clapton, etc.) and the outdoor potfests (Grateful Dead, Weir/Wasserman, Buffet, etc.). The shows were enjoyable (for certain values thereof), but I wouldn't call them 'moving.' Virtually unknown bands in small, smokey dives with crappy acoustics (the venue, not the instruments) but lots of energy (from the crowd as well as the band)...now that is entertainment. And the chix are usually a lot more, uh, friendly. :p

JMO. YMMV. HAND.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Wildwood
Posted 2007-03-13 1:01 PM (#111044 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
July 2006
Posts: 95

Location: St Louis
Grew up in southern Michigan. Saw many shows at Cobo. Seger, Nugent, Ryder...

Detroit was at one time a great R&R city. Then came SF, NY, Boston, Seattle...

Don't forget Austin, Memphis, Macon, Muscle Shoals...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2007-03-13 1:56 PM (#111045 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Detroit was at one time a great R&R city.
How true.
Many citys have had their time at the top.
For a time Detroit was on top...for a time.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
schroeder
Posted 2007-03-13 5:57 PM (#111046 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 4413

London is the #1 rock city in the universe.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2007-03-13 6:42 PM (#111047 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
#1 rock city in the universe.
I've asked you over a million times... don't exagerate.

If you run into Pete or Roger down at the pub, tell 'em I said hey.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Omaha
Posted 2007-03-13 6:51 PM (#111048 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 1126

Location: Omaha, NE
Has anyone mentioned Nashville?

These days, Branson is huge, too.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
lanaki
Posted 2007-03-13 7:05 PM (#111049 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
October 2006
Posts: 5576

Location: big island
then there's bakersfield, california. (nashville west)at least they made a run at it for awhile.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Wildwood
Posted 2007-03-14 1:45 PM (#111050 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
July 2006
Posts: 95

Location: St Louis
Originally posted by Omaha:
Has anyone mentioned Nashville?

These days, Branson is huge, too.
Maybe for country...but not R&R, IMHO
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Wildwood
Posted 2007-03-14 1:51 PM (#111051 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
July 2006
Posts: 95

Location: St Louis
Then again...I really don't like to pigeonhole music.

How about "Which is the 2nd Best City for R&R/Blues/Delta Blues/Jump Blues/Jazz/Alt Jazz/Alt Country/Grundge/Garage/Punk?"
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Old Applause Owner
Posted 2007-03-15 7:02 PM (#111052 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
July 2003
Posts: 1922

Location: Canton (Detroit), MI
Detroit's time has come again for a moment.....Bob Seger and The Silver Bullet Band is playing at Cobo tonight and Saturday night....he is recording, also...."Live Bullet II", anyone???? :D

Roger
Top of the page Bottom of the page
fillhixx
Posted 2007-03-15 8:41 PM (#111053 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?



Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 4833

Location: Campbell River, British Columbia
Originally posted by Omaha:
Branson is huge, too.
Yeah. all the hot new sounds are there! :rolleyes:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
FlicKreno aka Solid Top
Posted 2007-03-15 9:02 PM (#111054 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
April 2006
Posts: 2491

Location: Copenhagen Denmark
So where was Bill Haley from (1)
Where was E A Presley from (2)

Vic :cool:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
an4340
Posted 2007-03-15 9:22 PM (#111055 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
May 2003
Posts: 4389

Location: Capital District, NY, USA Minor Outlying Islands
I've heard that the Seattle area is happening, any opinions from you Seattlians? Seattlers? Seattlings? Seattlards? Seattlites?

What the heck do you call people from seattle?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
guitarwannabee
Posted 2007-03-15 10:42 PM (#111056 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 1487

Location: Michigan
RAIN-OUTS ??? GWB
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jason_S
Posted 2007-03-15 10:46 PM (#111057 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
August 2006
Posts: 2804

Location: ranson,wva
WET??? JASON
Top of the page Bottom of the page
nonis
Posted 2007-03-15 11:08 PM (#111058 - in reply to #111010)
Subject: Re: Which is the 2nd Best City for Rock & Roll ?


Joined:
December 2005
Posts: 117

For sure it's Milwaukee! Oh no... no it isn't. :(
Top of the page Bottom of the page