OT: Baggs I beam pickup
Beal
Posted 2007-09-14 3:23 PM (#81825)
Subject: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
Anyone have experience with one of these? I got another Merrill today, a C-18 and Jim Merrill recommended putting this in it. I was leaning toward a Fishman something.
All comments welcome.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2007-09-14 3:27 PM (#81826 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
Bill, everyone I know who has installed an I-Beam has ended up ripping it out. They sound great, totally different to an undersaddle and approaching the sound of a good microphone. But, the feedback threshold for live performance is ridiculously low. Great for coffee-house volume levels, but forget it if you need to crank it or are competeing with other instruments.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2007-09-14 3:37 PM (#81827 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
I've heard the Sunrise are very good. But their 2007 run of 1000 has been sold out.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2007-09-14 3:50 PM (#81828 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
Thanks Paul
Waskel, this sunrise, is that the one that hangs in the sound hole? I had one of those but they kill the acoustic sound. That's why I was looking for something light that would amplify but not compromise the acousticness of the guitar
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2007-09-14 3:54 PM (#81829 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Well, lately Phil Keaggy's been using the L. R. Baggs Micro Duet (Baggs under-saddle piezo transducer with onboard preamp and internal condenser mic) in his Langejans and his Olson for his concerts. He's pretty picky about sound quality.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
gulfcoast
Posted 2007-09-14 7:06 PM (#81830 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 1330

Location: ms
I`ve been using BAGGS for over 15 years and to me the R T System 11 is the best. The IBeams are all but useless. They just have too much top and body noise. A lot of people love the new Element Active they seem to have too many mids for me. I use a M1 nonactive soundhole a lot and i think there a lot more acoustic than the sunrise but you need a DI for sure.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Capo Guy
Posted 2007-09-14 7:14 PM (#81831 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 4394

Location: East Tennessee
I put a K & K pure western mini in my 000 Martin. I love the sound but can have some feedback issues.

I am thinking of putting a Fishman Neo D Sound Hole Pickup in another acoustic. Not sure I would like the sound so I might take my guitar to the store and try it before I buy it. I may just get another K & K and buy a feedback buster.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2007-09-15 6:19 AM (#81832 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
I've been a big fan of the Sunrise for many years, especially for Weissenborn, but it's an old design and it's starting to show it's age compared to the best of the newer magnetics. If you want to go down the magnetic route the Seymour Duncan MagMic combines a soundhole pickup with an onboard mini condenser mike, each with it's own volume. The other good one is the Baggs M1. Both are smaller than the Sunrise and sound excellent, much better than you'd expect from this type of pickup. Like any magnetic pickup they work best with nickel strings.

GGG, a feedback buster may not be a great deal of help with K&K pickups. The point of a feedback buster is to raise the resonant frequency of the body cavity. Feedback issues with soundboard contact pickups are often made even worse by the other main feedback source, which is top resonance. The only way to deal with that is to turn down, or notch it out with a parametric EQ.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2007-09-15 6:19 AM (#81833 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bauerhillboy
Posted 2007-09-15 8:12 AM (#81834 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
February 2004
Posts: 1634

Location: Warren,Pa.
I just love to sit at your feet and listen to you, Temp. :)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2007-09-15 9:21 AM (#81835 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
as long as he keeps his shoes on . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2007-09-15 9:43 AM (#81836 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
...and doesn't pitch forward suddenly.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
fillhixx
Posted 2007-09-15 11:13 AM (#81837 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 4827

Location: Campbell River, British Columbia
3'7" is the normal maximum range for projectile vomit, but you have to factor in body length from ass to mouth and add that for total safety.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
PEZ
Posted 2007-09-15 1:20 PM (#81838 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
July 2003
Posts: 3111

Location: Nashville TN.
I have Fishman Acoustic matrix in my Martin and my Guild. I had no problems. Sounds good no feedback.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2007-09-15 5:05 PM (#81839 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
I'd use the Fishman Matrix but it's a through saddle and that installation will be very tricky. I also don't want to hang anything in the sound hole, that kills the sound acoustically. It seems to be between the I Beam and K&K western mini.
Paul, you got an opinion on the K&K?

It really seems to come down to the undersaddle is the best sound electrically and doesn't compromise the acoustic sound. Decisions, decisions.....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2007-09-16 12:17 AM (#81840 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
Through saddle? Bummer. Very tricky pickup installation and still have it look good.

Any soundboard contact pickup (I-Beam, K&K, Schatten etc) will by it's nature have a significantly lower feedback threshold than an undersaddle or a magnetic. That's the only real disdvantage, so it depends on how loud you need to be. They can sound really good if your're careful and know what your're doing, but personally I'm not prepared to deal with the payoff of much lower usable headroom before feedback. That's why I always come back to the Ovation pickup.

I wouldn't dimiss a good soundhole pickup. Darren has a Baggs M1 belonging to me up at the factory. Feel free to try it out.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2007-09-16 8:01 AM (#81841 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
"Fishman RareEarth Blend" soundhole pups are very good.
They have either single coil or H'buckers and a condenser. They have a very narrow profile as well.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2007-09-16 11:17 AM (#81842 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
Thanks guys. I have one of the Tak (Baggs) soundhole pickups that gets used in conjunction with the cool tube preamp. It sounded good but when I put it on the guitar is just about cut the tone in half. What I really want is this nice acoustic guitar that I can plug in at the Florida house, read about 5% ot the playing time. I'll look at the beam and K&K. I got a couple of others gitters I could try them out on first to see how they work.
Paul, I agree with you, if this was a more full time thing and playing on real stages I'd use the 84, or one of the Adamaii or a Tak.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2007-09-17 9:50 AM (#81843 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
What's the opinion on Highlander's???
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2007-09-17 10:07 AM (#81844 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
The Highlander undersaddle pickup is coaxial piezo cable. Very similar to the Baggs Element. Personally I prefer cable pickups to the Fishman type, not only in terms of tone, but they seem to be less problematic with string-to-string balance. Maybe they're more tolerant of imprecise instalation. The Highlander preamps are good too. The Highlander Magnaphonic is about the only pickup worth considering for a Tri-Cone.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2007-09-17 5:19 PM (#81845 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
I've used them on my tricones and they work well. I solved the problem by ordering an I beam, a K&K, and a Fishbreath for a different Collings. Sort it all out later.....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
luthier444
Posted 2007-09-19 6:43 PM (#81846 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 255

I love the Baggs I- Mix.. Ive found if that Ibeam isnt in the right place you have issues.. Just make sure who puts it in knows what they are doing..
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Capo Guy
Posted 2007-09-19 9:59 PM (#81847 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 4394

Location: East Tennessee
Anyone tried the Fishman Rare Earth Single Coil?

Magnetic that mounts in the soundhole. Can this type of pickup deliver a decent acoustic tone?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Paul Templeman
Posted 2007-09-19 10:27 PM (#81848 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750

Location: Scotland
The Fishman Rare Earth is not actualy a Fishman design. They licensed it from a Scottish luthier called Mike Vanden when it was originally called "Mimesis". I used a Mimesis single coil for many years on one of my slide guitars and it did a good job at the time. The Mimesis/Rare Earth design has been around for over a decade and there are arguably better soundhole pickups available now. I've replaced mine with the Baggs M1. The Baggs is passive and to my ear out-performs the active Rare Earth. Also, the lack of adjustable pole-pieces on the Rare Earth became a major problem to me.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2007-09-19 10:43 PM (#81849 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
Originally posted by Paul Templeman:
the lack of adjustable pole-pieces on the Rare Earth became a major problem to me.
Interesting.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Capo Guy
Posted 2007-09-20 9:18 AM (#81850 - in reply to #81825)
Subject: Re: OT: Baggs I beam pickup



Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 4394

Location: East Tennessee
Paul,

Thanks for your insight. I will look at the Baggs M1. I just picked up an old 1114 Folklore and thought I would put another K & K mini in it like I did my Martin 000. But after seeing how much more boomier the Folklore is than the Martin I decided I would either put an under saddle or magnetic in it.
Top of the page Bottom of the page