Probably not the original bridge...
ksdaddy
Posted 2012-11-15 6:31 PM (#461878)
Subject: Probably not the original bridge...


Joined:
April 2003
Posts: 608

Location: Caribou, ME
...right?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/300817484099?_trksid=p5197.c0.m619
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Darkbar
Posted 2012-11-15 6:41 PM (#461879 - in reply to #461878)
Subject: Re: Probably not the original bridge...



Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536

Location: Flahdaw
Ridiculous....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jay
Posted 2012-11-15 6:46 PM (#461880 - in reply to #461878)
Subject: RE: Probably not the original bridge...



Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 1249

Location: Texas

no...

Look like they got the 5 points right...

Should have been something like this:

 





(obridge.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments obridge.jpg (19KB - 0 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
AdamasW597
Posted 2012-11-16 8:35 AM (#461892 - in reply to #461878)
Subject: Re: Probably not the original bridge...



Joined:
November 2008
Posts: 400

Location: Northwest Arkansas
They want way too much money. That guitar is cracked badly.

Edited by AdamasW597 2012-11-16 8:36 AM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Geostorm98
Posted 2012-11-16 11:34 AM (#461894 - in reply to #461878)
Subject: RE: Probably not the original bridge...



Joined:
September 2011
Posts: 402

Location: New Hartford CT
Sad to see a shiny bowl DB wind up like that.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jay
Posted 2012-11-16 11:56 AM (#461895 - in reply to #461894)
Subject: RE: Probably not the original bridge...



Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 1249

Location: Texas

Yep, totally abused.

Once I went through the pictures, it appeared to me that the bowl would be the only thing worth saving. And they didnt show a complete picture of that.

The goldflake printing on the headstock was still in legible condition. 

Top of the page Bottom of the page