|
|
Joined: December 2001 Posts: 10583
Location: NJ | hey everyone.
I need a quick easy way to edit a large wav file
it is 65 minutes long but has about 10 tunes on it or so
how can I divide this up without going through a lot of crap?
windows based please
post here or e mail me |
|
|
|
Joined: August 2006 Posts: 3145
Location: Marlton, NJ | I've used this in the past when separating tracks from LPs that I converted to digital:
Dart |
|
|
|
Joined: April 2006 Posts: 972
Location: PDX | I use Audacity -- it's free and very intuitive.
_____
gh1 |
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | Cakewalk PYRO |
|
|
|
Joined: April 2009 Posts: 130
Location: London, UK | I'd recommend Audacity as the best free-of-charge tool for recording and editing sound on a PC.
http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2001 Posts: 10583
Location: NJ | dart will not allow over 2 minutes of recording on the demo version |
|
|
|
Joined: April 2008 Posts: 2336
Location: Brighty in Blighty | Wavosaur is much better than Audacity and is also feee. |
|
|
|
Joined: November 2006 Posts: 3969
| +2 on Audacity. |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2001 Posts: 7236
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest | +1 for Audacity or Wavosaur
I think I like Wavosaur better. |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2006 Posts: 6268
Location: Florida Central Gulf Coast | Originally posted by G8r:
+2 on Audacity. +3... I have an old promo Christmas album that has been a tradition for all my girls' lives. I wanted to make CDs for them as a present three years ago.
Of course there was the normal record noise. So I used Audacity to sample the noise twix two songs and 'subtracted' the sample from the whole recording. Wow, what a difference! Worked out great.
So, I'm very satisfied with the freebie... |
|
|
|
 Joined: February 2005 Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | Audacity is pretty darn good for a freebee. (+4)
Wavosaur is useful for simple editing but has some file size limitations, and it's not a sequencer, so you can't overlay tracks. |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2001 Posts: 10583
Location: NJ | downloaded audacity and it makes the stuff sounds like chipmonks
I quit
thanks for the suggestions though |
|
|
|
Joined: August 2006 Posts: 3145
Location: Marlton, NJ | Al - if you can get me the file, I own the Dart SW. I can split the file for you. |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2001 Posts: 7236
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest | What are the specs of the source file? (bit rate, depth, etc..) |
|
|
|
 Joined: February 2005 Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | Al, forgot about this one - WavePad .
Easy to use and free.
Just open the file, use your mouse to select a section, hit copy, new, paste and save it. Then move on to the next section. |
|
|
|
Joined: October 2006 Posts: 5575
Location: big island | just curious... is this a recording made with your olympus ls-10? |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2001 Posts: 10583
Location: NJ | Originally posted by lanaki:
just curious... is this a recording made with your olympus ls-10? yes but as my mother would say
what does that have to do with the price of eggs? |
|
|
|
Joined: October 2006 Posts: 5575
Location: big island | i haven't checked the full specs on it but i was wondering if it offered the option of splitting the tracks itself? i think that feature is built in on the "zoom H4". |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2001 Posts: 7236
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest | I was asking because the bit rate on the source, may not match what your computer or the software can do.
Does the file playback on your computer with just the media player? (I didn't want to assume you tried that already) |
|
|