|
|
Joined:
February 2004
Posts: 548
Location: Up North | at least one Ovation made the list - 47th out of 50
LA TIMES - 50 Guitars |
|
| |
|
Joined:
June 2005
Posts: 496
Location: California | Nice color.. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 2791
Location: Atlanta, GA. | They sure missed the boat on #25.
So much for their list! |
|
| |
|
Joined:
July 2008
Posts: 39
Location: MA | As with all "Best/Worse/Top/Bottom" lists---
Meh. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
September 2005
Posts: 3619
Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :) | Another reason I never cared for the LA Times. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15679
Location: SoCal | LA Times is such a screwed up newspaper. Until he died, Jim Murray was the only writer that made that rag bearable.... |
|
| |
|
Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 4832
Location: Campbell River, British Columbia | Stuff like this is just a good reason for an argument to matter what. It has very little use other than that as the criteria is entirely subjective.....there is NO objective criteria for what is a good guitar.
Ask Skunk Baxter or any other garbage guitar aficionado. Heck, I wish I still had the Japanese electric I had in the 60's with all the mojo switches, a built in speaker, and eight penlight batteries. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 5332
Location: Bluffton, SC | wot fill said. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2005
Posts: 3736
Location: Sunshine State, Australia | Didn't any of you notice what was #1?
Not quite an Ovation, but... |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2005
Posts: 3736
Location: Sunshine State, Australia | Didn't any of you notice what was #1?
Not quite an Ovation, but... |
|
| |
LA Times 50 guitars