|
|
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Welllllllll...after all the recent back and forth, I figured I needed to do a recording with the Custom MWoody (the now legendary "DBWNSHEW") that I bought from Mike (MWoody) some months back.
So I did.
When I bought the guitar, per MWoody's suggestion, I tuned it to an Open G and started playing around.
Well, at first it was a REAL challenge, but after a while I was able to play some things that made some sense to me. Developed a bit on them, and soon enough had some things that I kinda liked.
The guitar is, as I mentioned, a custom MWoody, with a deep bowl, a wide neck, a slot head and a Josh White signature. It's a red burst -- a really pretty color. It came equipped with an iDea preamp. Very nice!
The guitar has a really nice sound, unlike any other that I have, and unlike any Ovation that I own. In a good way.
The sound is very much in the mid-range; not the booming of the 2080, but, then, it's not supposed to be a 2080.
It resonates well and is a lot of fun to play. In the high ranges, it's kind of tinkly and light, and all in all, very pleasant.
Its action is high and I think my next step will be to lower it.
The fingerboard is a tiny bit rough in places, but that makes me think that I can manhandle it a bit. I usually have a light touch on the strings, but I feel that I can wrestle with this one, and I like that.
By contrast, the OFC II is probably more rugged, but because it cost a tad more, I treat it in a more gingerly way.
The song I posted on my ning page is called "OpenInG." Get it? Open in G? First song with an Open G guitar? Opening? Awwwww...fergit it!
Anyway, it's there, and there are a bunch (16 or so) of pictures of the guitar in a new album that I placed on the same page, and called, in true eponymous fashion: "MWoody Guitar."
I haven't named the guitar yet, but will give it a woman's name soon enough. Only women get to sit on my lap, after all.
The song is entirely acoustic, and consists only of the MWoody, except for a cameo by the OFC II. It appears at about 4:44 in the song and is there to provide contrast.
I have to apologize: my recording equipment is not all that great, so I fear that it just doesn't permit a good comparison. Anyway, at 4:44 and after, the OFC II is in the left channel and the MWoody is in the right.
The song reflects my usual modus operandi: (1) one take, (2) a basic backing track to set mood and key, and (3) the rest is improvisation. As a result, there are more clams than I'd like to admit. However, you all get all my practice sessions straight up and unedited.
So, here's the link to all the above-mentioned fun and frivolity: OpenInG | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301
Location: south east Michigan | That is just awful.
It's got to the point where I can't even find any words of support.
Sorry Alan. | |
| | |
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 2793
Location: Atlanta, GA. | WTF!?!?!?! | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301
Location: south east Michigan | Yeah... that's just what I thought of it too. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303
Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066 | well, it is different......... | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | I have trouble finding ONE guy to jam with....how do you manage to find 37? | |
| | |
Joined:
October 2007
Posts: 2711
Location: Vernon CT | Whether you like it or not,why not be positive and/or supportive? :confused: | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | OK, That's quite unique and truely a composition that the creator can love. | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | Sorry Alan, just kidding around with ya. (Feel free to trash everything I have ever recorded.) I think I'm WAAAAAY too Vanilla, and you're more Heavenly Hash. Somewhere in the middle are the people that actually make money doing this music stuff. | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301
Location: south east Michigan | Originally posted by BT717:
Whether you like it or not,why not be positive and/or supportive? :confused: Because it would not be honest.
When my practice partner & I first got together we put down some ground rules. Sure we agreed to be supportive of respectful of each other but the over riding rule was to be honest with each other.
When I'm doing something that is just not working, even tho I think it is, I can depend on an honest opinion given without malice. The objective is to sound presentable to the type of audience we sometimes play for. This has helped me to get better at my own humble level of musicianship.
And we have other check and balances that we welcome. One time Brian's wife knocked on the door to room where we practice, opened it and said, "What you were just doing a minute ago.... don't do that."
Then again... maybe I'm misreading the room. We talk about the great friendships we have here yet it seems they can't go beyond the level of blowing smoke and empty praise. The friendships that mean the most to me are the ones that can include some criticism along with the support. A least thats the way it used to be around here. | |
| | |
Joined:
November 2006
Posts: 3969
| We talk about the great friendships we have here yet it seems they can't go beyond the level of blowing smoke and empty praise. The friendships that mean the most to me are the ones that can include some criticism along with the support. Amen to that. In other words, friends take your keys away when you're too drunk to drive; pull you aside when you're about to take home the crackhead skank; etc. If they don't, they're not worth calling friends. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Originally posted by Slipkid:
Originally posted by BT717:
Whether you like it or not,why not be positive and/or supportive? :confused: Because it would not be honest.
When my practice partner & I first got together we put down some ground rules. Sure we agreed to be supportive of respectful of each other but the over riding rule was to be honest with each other.
When I'm doing something that is just not working, even tho I think it is, I can depend on an honest opinion given without malice. The objective is to sound presentable to the type of audience we sometimes play for. This has helped me to get better at my own humble level of musicianship.
And we have other check and balances that we welcome. One time Brian's wife knocked on the door to room where we practice, opened it and said, "What you were just doing a minute ago.... don't do that."
Then again... maybe I'm misreading the room. We talk about the great friendships we have here yet it seems they can't go beyond the level of blowing smoke and empty praise. The friendships that mean the most to me are the ones that can include some criticism along with the support. A least thats the way it used to be around here.
Thanks for all your comments!
I DO want the honest ones. I'm not at all sensitive as regards my playing. When something doesn't work for you, please let me know without sugar-coating!
Don't forget that the idea of the "song" was twofold: (1) to kick the DBWNSHEW's (pr.: DIB-win-shoe) tires publicly. (2) to post some pictures of it.
One quick note about the pictures: I am (it soon will be made very clear) NOT a photographer with the gifts of a Damon67, so my photos don't show the guitar at its best. In addition, some of the photos show the DBWNSHEW next to my '01C. That's just not fair! That's like putting ANY woman next to Jessica Biel. So, I DO owe the assembled multitudes (and MWoody) a more diligent attempt to portray the DBWNSHEW in a more flattering light and context.
Now, as regards kicking the DBWNSHEW's tires more publicly, I now realize, based on this reaction, that "OpenInG" should have the name: "Lead Balloon," or "T*rdInPunchBowl," but I have gone back to it several times, and I actually DO like it! I've probably gone back eight times or so to re-listen, and liked it a bit more each time. However, of course, the clams made themselves more evident each re-listening, too!
I think it DOES show in parts what the MWoody guitar can do. However, in retrospect, I think that Beal's comment probably most closely hit the proverbial nail on the head. Just as I have a face only my mother could love, maybe I AM the only one who could like this song. Not everyone else's cup o'tea! And that's just fine too.
To answer StephenT28's question, it's all just track duplication in Audacity (though I suspect he knew that already...just wanted to make sure). There are a couple of tracks that I duplicated, then offset by a half-second or so, and reduced the volume, to provide an echo (quite a different effect from using Audacity's "reverb" effect). I liked it so much that I did it a couple of times and with sometimes 5 or 6 echoes. Hence, the effect of a bunch of guitarists, when there was only one.
Make one track, then another, then another, duplicate a track or two, and all of a sudden five or six guitarists are playing together! Makes for some fun experimentation.
Please DO continue any constructive criticism you may have. And please pull no punches. | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301
Location: south east Michigan | Okay...
Perhaps by just saying it's "awful" is just a gut reaction and not a constructive criticism.
To me it sounds like a number of instruments warming up before a performance. It's that combination of sounds that tho they may be in the same key have no relationship to what that the other is doing.
Maybe I'm not enough of an ethereal ar-teest to "get it" but I can't pick out a melody, chorus, bridge or even connective theme to the piece. It has no beginning, middle or end. The only emotion I feel when listening is confusion.
Maybe it's the subliminal mathematical component that I'm missing. No matter if its Classical, Rock, or Country, 2 plus two will equal 4. I don't find that in any of the "meditations".
Yet it's apple and oranges. Your apple is the "high concept art" thing while my orange is British Invasion tunes.
I won't suggest that you change your ways or that what I like should be what you like, it's just that I can't listen to it. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2010
Posts: 1227
Location: Connersville, Indiana | Alan, I really don't see what the problem is. You were having fun, are you selling it, NO are you trying to be the re birth or Led Zep NO, did you enjoy what you were doing Yeah. Now in my opinion, too much echo all the time, use it at certain times, some of the leads were lousy, yet some were right on the money for the body of work. And I think it was played at a tempo just a little too fast, slow it down some let all the sound come forward and be absorbed. In a lot of way it is not much different than music from India, Italy or the greek islands. Re mix it, slow it down some. listen and you will hear the bad lead parts, get rid of them, and then to top it all off, if you are just starting to learn what you can and can't do with that tuning over all it is unique. In my younger days as a teen on acid it would be perfect. I guess what I'm trying to say Alan is give it another shot, take the feedback you have received and try it again. That's my humble two cents worth and in this economy that ain't worth squat. Just have fun. ;) | |
| | |
Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | Alan, sometimes less is more. But most often more is less. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Time to catch back up just a bit:
• Dark bar -- my apologies. I replied to YOU not T28 regarding the Audacity track duplication.
• Brad: Thanks...I didn't mind the "awful" reaction one bit. If that was your reaction, then that was your reaction. I DEFINITELY prefer your honest reaction to some unhelpful attempt to spare my feelings! I've had the same reaction to things that others have thought was just the best stuff ever. I suspect you'd have the same reaction to "Walkabout" (also on my ning page)...another experiment in taking whatever one could label my technique and trying to extend it a bit. I remain very mindful that most experiments are failures. Also, your comments about melody, chorus and bridge are well-made, and I'll be mindful of them in the future. Just to give you a bit of a chuckle, I've been on a "Green Grass and High Tides" and "In Memory of Elizabeth Reed" jag lately. Not "high concept art" by any means, but GREAT jamming tunes! And, I think that one form of the ultimate musical fun for me would be a session where three or four great guitarists get together and someone starts playing some rhythm, while the others improvise to the key that the first established. That interplay, kind of like a guitar gabfest, with interruptions, back and forths and lots of spontaneity, would be HUGE fun for me. After a while, one of the other guitarists signals that he'll take the rhythm and off they go again. And so on, 'til the end who knows when...
• Kit: Thanks for the support AND the very helpful critique. Your remarks make it evident that you REALLY listened, and I appreciate it. Based on what others have said, that probably wasn't all that easy! And I do appreciate it. Don't worry, there wasn't any "problem," just that many didn't like the song. I very much appreciate the very specific comments you had. I'm going to try to do a re-mix that removes some of the echoes and clams, and see what that does. If I think it has some worth, or improves it, I'll re-post. BTW, you're right about the Russian, Indian and other influences...
• Waskel: Much agreed...future attempts will keep this in mind as well!
• G8r: On the nose...By the way, I think I liked your post BEFORE the edit...you know: when "friends" were "fiends?" Lol! And, where were you when I was getting married to my now ex-wife?!?!?!?
• DB: Loved the Vanilla vs. Heavenly Hash comment! Sooooo...what do you think of "Heavenly Hash" as a band name??? At least as a song name! Probably WAAAY too copyrighted for a band name, though!
• All: many thanks for the critiques! I KNOW that I play a style that's just not for everyone, and even that some will absolutely hate it. NO PROBLEM! Please feel free to tell me you hate it! I just appreciate that you gave it a shot!
Now, before THIS response becomes an insincere-seeming attempt to agree with all of you, here's what I get when I listen to it (disclaimer: this is all JMHO, of course!): There ARE some REALLY pretty parts in there. I think it starts out pretty and contemplative, then quickly moves into the discordant. I like that kind of contrast. I like also that it then moves back into the more melodious at about 1:47. I like the little riff that gets repeated and echoed for 30 or 35 seconds. At 2:37 another melody and mood start up. The section starts slowly and builds speed and last about a minute. I really like the effect. At 4:00 I like the jangly note repetition harmony and I love the echoed pinch harmonies at 4:39. I also like the interplay between the OFC II and the MWoody right after that. The idea was to give some opportunity to compare and contrast the two guitars, but my recording equipment doesn't really permit a good comparison. This guitar dialogue/argument/duel/whatever lasts 'bout a minute and a half...then the song goes totally into dissonance to stop the dialogue. I liked the wind-down ending. That's the good stuff I took from it. The bad stuff is, of course, the the clams, the fact that the whole recording is crude and unpolished, and the other things that you all pointed out.
Now, before schroeder grumps that this has become nothing but a self-promotion thread, the prime directive REALLY was to fulfill a commitment to MWoody that I made when I purchased the DBWNSHEW some months ago (Review, recording and pictures)... In the meantime, if I can score some helpful hints at how to be a better guitarist and musician, well I admit I AM all about that!
So, thanks, all! | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | Schroder grumps about everything, it's his job.
I'll say it ain't my kind of music, it strikes me like modern art, trying to make a picture with splashes of color that appear to be random splahses, even though they may not be. Like some of the Mahaveeshnu shit from back when, nice for a while but not really any staying power. A lot of people like this so more power to them.
I'm just in a totally different place for what I try to play and want to listen to. A good song that will make you feel something, delivered in a way that you can understand, with good sounding and interesting guitar parts, the sum or which makes you want to hear it again.
And they need to be fun to play. | |
| | |
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 2793
Location: Atlanta, GA. | I'll stand by my original post, however, I'm sure Buddy Holley didn't "get it right" during his initial experiments with overdubbing.
Go for it Alan! | |
| | |
Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 2150
Location: Orlando, FL | Alan, you put yourself out there open and unedited for all to see/listen to. It's kind of saying "this is who I am, love me or don't." I respect that. You are asking for honest feedback and listening as well. I respect that too.
This honestly isn't the kind of music I enjoy, no biggie. NO matter how much advice and criticism you get and adhere to, I'm sure you will always sound like Alan! That's great.
My advice, FWIW, is start with a simple melody. Add simple parts. Be conscious of how each part adds to the whole.
I am with Brad on the song structure thing. That's just something we are used to. Even if it's a loose structure to hang a bunch of jamming on. The songs you mentioned, In memory of Elizabeth Reed and Green Grass and high tides are big jam songs, but they have a very definite structure with strong melodies. Even the solos are built up melodically.
When two guitars or more guitars are playing together there is a lot of listening to the other players involved. Just listen to yourself and think about what to add to compliment what is already going on. Don't be afraid of space in the music. It helps the listener digest and feel what you are saying.
Good Luck. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303
Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066 | not sure why I keep getting drug into the Audacity thingy (and being confused with ANY COMMENT by Darkbar is just damn insulting). I never mentioned anything about it or the recording.
This was my only comment to date:
Originally posted by stephent28:
well, it is different......... I think Beal's last comment echoed my feelings on the piece pretty well. | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2006
Posts: 10777
Location: Keepin' It Weird in Portland, OR | This is why I don't post the crap that I create! :p
That piece could be quite good if I were stoned, depending on what I was stoned on.
I actually listened to the whole thing yesterday, and I am listening to it now.
I do some free-form finger-picking stuff on the street corner and get occasional compliments.
But I actually had one dude a coupla weeks ago comment that I was the worst player he had ever heard.
(he must not get around much)
I didn't let it bother me, cuz about a dozen other people had thrown in dollar bills.
Guess it depends on where you are coming from.
Feel Free to create anything that makes you happy.
-- The next track, Babbling Brook, just came up and it is Nice.
Yeah, Mahavishnu Orchestra, Ravi Shankar, some of that Free Form Jazz whatever. :cool: | |
| | |
Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 13997
Location: Upper Left USA | I am way too delicate to expose myself to this crowd. Way to go Alan!
I think the Woody needs to play Malaguana and Four and Twenty for us as well. | |
| | |
Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 4413
| "The song reflects my usual modus operandi: (1) one take, (2) a basic backing track to set mood and key, and (3) the rest is improvisation. As a result, there are more clams than I'd like to admit. However, you all get all my practice sessions straight up and unedited."
So who else here when they post some
music posts their first attempt/practise and invites everyone to listen to it?
All of the great stuff on bobbo's Song of the Day thread - was that first shot and "clams included'? I think not. I think all of those people had the decency to create something worth listening to.
I can think of no serious musician who has ever released his practise tapes.
I have spent most of my life playing in jazz clubs and even at the height of the free form movement nobody played shit like that. If it is free form it requires other players to have any validity. Simply covering up the fact that you can't create a harmonic or melodic sequence that can then move and develop by playing self indulgent wanderings is not free form jazz. And the fact that the various guitars are out of tune doesn't make it art. The fact that they are then out of tune with each other just makes it worse.
And the fact that every piece comes with a 500 word essay explaining it to us morons is further evidence of the insufferable ego that thinks we want to listen to him practise.
I notice none of this stuff is ever offered to the general public in clubs or bars. | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301
Location: south east Michigan | Well said Schroeder.
That old tale... "The Emperor Has No Clothes" also comes to mind. | |
| | |
Joined:
August 2007
Posts: 494
Location: Location Location Location | This is too funny...anyway, here's a video that will go perfectly. Just keep the sound turned off..Uh.. I mean the sound of the video..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPnGPIMUnus | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Schroeder: Very rich post. However, you protest way too much. You ascribe character flaws to my "modus operandi," with the "decency" remark. Kind of a stretch in logic, eh? Yes I "invite" you to listen. You can decline. And, yes, I'd sit in on the practice sessions of LOTS of the guitarists on this forum.
If the answer to your rhetorical question: "So who else here when they post some
music posts their first attempt/practise and invites everyone to listen to it?" is: "nobody," then I'm happy to be the one to introduce you to something new.
Your criticisms are pungent, and as regards the music, I take them all to head and heart. However, in trying to marry all the musical critiques to my character, your mistakes are legion, and it leads me to believe that you suffer from a liver complaint.
Is it presumptuous of me to say that? Of course! But only as presumptuous as your conclusion that I have "an insufferable ego," that I lack "decency," that I'm "self-indulgent," etc., etc., etc., based only on "inviting you to my practice session."
Schroeder, I'll quote a luminary from this forum for your benefit... In the context of someone in Mexico putting a bad rendition of a Beatles song on YouTube, this worthy said, "when you put yourself out there, as this guy did, I'll have a lot more respect for your criticism." Yes, it's a rough paraphrasing, but that's pretty close to what the guy said.
Look, I'm very happy to accept the evaluation that my modus operandi is flawed -- at which point, I'll change it, of course -- but that has no relation to who I am as a person.
As to the rest of what you said, I have never made any claims as to my quality as a guitarist. I DO, however, like to get feedback from others who are obviously quality quitarists.
Also, you have no idea under the sun whether or not "this stuff is ever offered to the general public in clubs or bars." More, your assertion presumes that my goal is to offer my stuff "to the general public in clubs or bars." Surely that's not the only way one can experience music?
Yes, my "stuff" IS offered to the general public, but not in bars or clubs. Doesn't change, I have to admit, the fact that I'd like to.
With all that said, I appreciate the critiques. Your thoughts on the playing are very welcome. I venture into dangerous territory here, but can you point me to recordings of yours? I do NOT in any way mean that there have to be any, but you seemed to indicate in my case that I had to have an established body of work in order to do what I did with the DBWNSHEW...remember, my goals were MUCH more modest than what you seem to think I was aiming to do.
Oh, yeah...the guy who stood up for the Mexican guy with the bad rendition of the Beatles song? That was you.
...
Brad, Brad, Brad...when did I EVER imply that I was the emperor?!?!?!? First: Al (Pepiak) is the emperor! Next: Beal is Gandalf...or Buddha, or Yoda, or Obi-Wan. (3) I'm just a humble guitar player who hopes to be a little bit better today than I was yesterday, and a little bit better tomorrow than I am today.
Schroeder: I hope you can take my rejoinder in the spirit in which it was intended. I LOVED your attempted devastation of my humble offering, but HAD to respond with something in kind, or others would have been disappointed.
Gotta go...mass is in 25 minutes.
Best,
Alan | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301
Location: south east Michigan | Brad, Brad, Brad...when did I EVER imply that I was the emperor?!?!?!? I was making a reference to the moral of the story, but if the invisible clothes fit....
Sorry Schroeder... I started it but you took the scathing collateral damage.
I hope you'll be okay. | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 1132
Location: NW Washington State | I saw Mahavishnu a few times and have had the staying power to continue listening over the years. This sample bears no resemblance to McLaughlin, DiMeola, or Coryell.
Try playing scales and arpeggios slowly against a metronome or click track. You can't play fast if you can't play slow.
Work through some standard chord progessions- slowly- with the metronome or click track. Just play straight 4 (or 3 or 5 or 7), no accents, nothing fancy, not fast.
Record yourself playing the scales and progressions- slowly- and see if you're right on the beat. If not, you're not ready to play fast.
Rubato is nice if you also have a strong sense of meter and rhythm.
I used to practice more, but I don't play for more than a few minutes at a time now. So I'm just another wanking noodler, but I still like to hear the sound of the guitar. Maybe I should post some samples for everyone's enjoyment!
-Steve W. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2006
Posts: 1017
Location: Budd Lake, NJ | Gee, I go to visit a friend in the hospital who's dying and miss all the...fun.
If the purpose of music is evoke a response in the listener (good, bad or indifferent) then it has done what is was intended to do. (Notice that the number of responses to this post got past the "0," "5," or "10" mark.)
I listened to it--and because I tend to think in pictures, in the beginning of the piece I imagined a beehive, alive with swarming bees around it; in the middle, there was something about it the made me think of butterflies. (I don't expect anyone to agree with me; that's just what it made me think of.)
I think the reactions posted here are fairly consistent with what the music made me think of in the beginning. :D ;)
--Karen | |
| | |
Joined:
July 2005
Posts: 176
| I think Elaine from Seinfeld would have no problems dancing to it. | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | But is it sponge-worthy? | |
| | |
Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750
Location: Scotland | Alan, your verbosity is in indirect proportion to your musicality. Please, do us all a favour and stop posting these truly skilless dirges until you have learned at least a few of the fundimental rules of melody and composition. Dude, please.........give us a break | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | Sponge-worthy
Got to love it.
George and Kramer might be able to dance to it as well.
But hey, Alan, do what you want to do.
Yoda? Budda?? QQF???
Je suis le Mauvais Beal. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Just a quick check in before I have to leave again and bring kids here and there...
I have to admit, I'm pretty concerned...I'm pretty sure that I've never represented that I'm trying to play in the same league as McLaughlin, Coryell, etc., yet what I hear is people comparing me to them.
So, I'm going to take as a supreme compliment the fact that so many are assuming so much from so little (paraphrasing Churchill). Schroeder compared me to a whole body of work about which I have no knowledge whatsoever -- free jazz, then proceeded to lambaste me because I fell short. That's a little bit like telling me, after a nice birdie on a municipal golf course, "Well, you're no Tiger Woods!" Ummmmm...I knew that already...but thanks for mentioning me in the same breath!
The fact that Schroeder thought I was in that arena to start, when I never made any such claim, is very encouraging. Numbfingers also compared me (unfavorably, of course) to McLaughlin, DiMeola and Coryell; yet -- you can look it up -- I truly have never made any representation that I thought I could play on their jungle gym!
Here's the deal...I'm a VERY busy single daddy of two youngish chldren, and I have NO TIME WHATSOEVER to become edu-ma-cated on music theory, or who does what when, or what rubato means, or what free jazz is all about. I play for fun in my living room, and I produce the occasional thing that pleases me, and sometimes some others.
A while ago, I bought a guitar from MWoody -- the now legendary DBWNSHEW -- that, I promised him, would produce (1) a review, (2) a recording, and (3) some pictures....I was late with all three, and in a recent thread, MWoody rightly chided me for that tardiness...I made the recording that has produced so much strum and drang (get it? "strum" and drang?) and thought I was pretty clever when I named it "OpenInG." That's about it. Oh, and I DID, I admit, ask for impressions. I was hoping that some might say that there was stuff in my song that might be nice to hear on an OFC CD or something.
Instead, Schroeder tells me I'm no free jazz master, and numbfingers tells me I'm no Mclaughlin or DiMeola or Coryell... Ummm...I know all that...
Now, the bottom line: the fact that some of you ARE comparing me in arenas MUCH larger than where I deserve to be, without my prompting, is deeply flattering, and I thank you. However, Karen's review came, I think, MUCH closer to summing up about what I reasonably could hope to garner in terms of feedback for the song itself: a number of moods and images that are roughly what I was picturing when I made it.
I was particularly grateful also to the others of you who made concrete suggestions for how to improve it (Kit, Colin, Brad, db, Waskel).
To those who indicated that they simply didn't like it for whatever reason (Stephent28, Beal)... much appreciated. ALSO perfectly valid and honest feedback.
And, thanks go to Brad, whose intent I completely misread (SCHROEDER is the naked emperor, right?), I apologize.
Karen's the one, I think, who came at this whole thing trying just to give impressions -- with no preconceived notions or agendas -- and I appreciate that a whole lot as well.
Everyone else seemed to have an exam form in hand checking for whether I had darkened the correct bubbles...all while I wasn't taking an exam...just playing a little something with a new guitar.
I know Schroeder will take a scorch that here is yet another 500 word essay about this or that, and what a colossal ego and all that, but the only reason I write these screeds is 'cause I can (cf, Segovia, Andres). And they're fun...or is Schroeder going to tell me what's fun and what's not? Ummmm...were we talking about colossal egos? And, this particular rejoinder covers so much ground only because schroeder and numbfingers took all this so seriously, despite the actual spirit in which it all originated.
No one has to read these dissertations of mine (so, of course, Schroeder will publicly "decline" to read it, indicating that he did anyway...) at all, but then we will be reduced to 12- to 20-word posts that are marvels of brevity, AND wide open to interpretation and misinterpretation, or are wonderful esoteric jokes known to only a select inner circle...ie that say nothing.
The REAL bottom line: You all have provided me with GREAT feedback, covering a wide, wide range of thought, and I'm grateful for it. Especially to Schroeder and Numbfingers!
So, THANKS! | |
| | |
Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6996
Location: Jet City | Originally posted by Old Man Arthur:
That piece could be quite good if I were stoned, depending on what I was stoned on. Nope, I've tried 3 different mind altering substances now. Same result. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Originally posted by Paul Templeman:
Alan, your verbosity is in indirect proportion to your musicality. Please, do us all a favour and stop posting these truly skilless dirges until you have learned at least a few of the fundimental rules of melody and composition. Dude, please.........give us a break It's spelled "fundamental."
Temp, your wisdom is in indirect poroportion to your scottishness...Please stop posting these illiterate screeds, until you have learned at least the fundamental rules of orthography...
JUST KIDDING!!!
(But, it WAS fun to write!) | |
| | |
Joined:
November 2006
Posts: 3969
| Alan, sometimes showing off comes off as just that - showing off. Yes, we know you can play many notes in succession in a very short period of time, regardless of Western ideas of tonality, and I applaud you for your willingness to put it out there. Yes, we also know you can use a thesaurus. Repeatedly hitting people over the head with either of those exhibitions does nothing to ingratiate yourself to others.
Oh, and Paul is most certainly not Scottish. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | I know...it was intemperate on my part, and I apologize.
However, in my defense, it WAS in response to a particularly mean-spirited post directed at me from Temp. I'm pretty sure that he wasn't offended, and I DID say I was just kidding. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Originally posted by Damon67:
Originally posted by Old Man Arthur:
That piece could be quite good if I were stoned, depending on what I was stoned on. Nope, I've tried 3 different mind altering substances now. Same result. | |
| | |
Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750
Location: Scotland | My post was not mean-spirited at all. I was just offering a little friendly advice | |
| | |
Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | Alan, what I see is you constantly asking for, getting, and being grateful for feedback. You say you take it to heart, yet you continue posting (from what I can tell) the same thing. Same concept, same execution.
You seem either not interested in or incapable of applying any of the advice you keep soliciting... so why keep asking for it? | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 1132
Location: NW Washington State | My post was not comparing you to those players, but Mahavishnu was mentioned earlier in the thread. The important part is about practicing before you present this stuff. Yes, it is "fundamental".
And don't drag poor dead Andres Segovia into this.
If I were MWoody, I'd want the title of this thread changed to "An Alan Smithee Recording".
-Steve W. | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2006
Posts: 10777
Location: Keepin' It Weird in Portland, OR | Hey! I let that whole collection of Alan's music play on the OFC Media Player...
It wasn't something that I could tap my foot too...
But it wasn't overly annoying.
Interesting background ambient sound for doing dishes and packing a Celebrity...
(It is not like cRap Music or anything Really annoying like that)
If being able to Play the Ovations that I own is a requirement for membership, I'm screwed. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Just a couple of quick remarks and a question or two...
• Waskel: this is actually the first time anyone's actually given me real, concrete feedback, despite the number of songs that I've place on ning. I have to admit this is my fault, in that I DIDN'T really overtly ask for feedback...just posted 'em, thinking that if they impressed anyone, either favorably or unfavorably, someone would mention it.
Now, at long last, I gather that no one likes my modus operandi, and I will be happy to change it. But it IS the first time that anyone's mentioned it.
• OMA: Your comments, above, are actually the very first comments on my "body of work" ever made -- at least that I'm aware of -- and I appreciate it.
• Numb: who is Alan Smithee?
• Beal: what does "QQF" mean? | |
| | |
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 2793
Location: Atlanta, GA. | I see the pompous asses have raised their... asses again!
Alan, I say fuck'em... show off all you want. Maybe all it needs is a bass line added. | |
| | |
Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6996
Location: Jet City | Originally posted by AlanM:
Originally posted by Damon67:
Originally posted by Old Man Arthur:
That piece could be quite good if I were stoned, depending on what I was stoned on. Nope, I've tried 3 different mind altering substances now. Same result. | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 1487
Location: Michigan | some things need no reply ???? GWB | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2009
Posts: 4536
Location: Flahdaw | Originally posted by Damon67:
Well share. Maybe I'll understand it better if I can get on a level plane with it's composer. [/QB] Just a guess, but I don't think it's Ambien. | |
| | |
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains | oops...when I first saw this posted I actually thought it was a recording by MWoody...my bad...
Hey, Alan, take it from me: guitar pictures always help...well..... :p | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Originally posted by MusicMishka:
oops...when I first saw this posted I actually thought it was a recording by MWoody...my bad...
Hey, Alan, take it from me: guitar pictures always help...well..... :p I did! I did! I did! First post indicates there are pictures on the ning site...Complete with disclaimer that I'm not nearly the photographer that Damon67 or Dweezil is... | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | And, through all this kerfuffle, nobody commented on the pictures! There are ACTUALLY a couple of really funny ones involving my cat, Apollo. That WAS, after all, one part of the tri-partite mission of this WHOOOOOOLE thing: review, recording, pictures... | |
| | |
Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 13997
Location: Upper Left USA | I thought the cat was great!
I think my Tigger is a close cousin... | |
| | |
Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301
Location: south east Michigan | I looked at those pictures.
They are just awful.
.
"kerfuffle"... "tri-partite".. in the same paragraph.
Maybe I should be impressed but I know it's just part of your "modus operandi".
It's time to put evil-Slipkid back in the closet but before I do.....
Alan...
You keep thanking me when I don't understand why. I'm in agreement with Schroeder and Temp.
About the "Emperor Has No Clothes" refference.
How you got Schroeder or Al cast as the Emperor I have no clue. To be clear, I see you playing the part of the Emperor. Yep... you are the guy that needed to hear an honest voice.
Don't be humbled by folks trying to communicate their thoughts by bringing up DiMeola, Coryell, or modern jazz. They are just vain attempts to connect what you do to something.... anything ... that exists in the real world.
As I read the comments there is no "supreme compliment" to be found in the refferences.
If you really truly wanted to demonstrate what Woody's guitar can do, For God's sake... play some thing relateable. Two tracks... one with a twelve bar blues and another with a simple lead would tell the story.
"Alan Smithee" is the pen name authors use when they are so embarassed by the material they do not want their real name anywhere near it.
And to be clear, this is not just about "OpeningInG"... I have felt this way about all your offerings. It's just that up until now I have been able to keep Evil-Slipkid on a short leash.
Call it tough love, brutal honesty, or just plain cruelty. For pehaps the first time you are hearing the true thoughts of your listeners. I hope you can find a way to benifit from it.
Say Goodnight Evil-Slipkid....
goodniiiight! | |
| | |
Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | QQF
Ques Que Fuck?
It's French for "Pardon me, I did not understand?" Or something like that. | |
| | |
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains | Uh...I actually meant it as a joke... | |
| | |
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 2793
Location: Atlanta, GA. | heh heh heh
The funny thing about this entire debaucle is, if everyone on this forum was as "thick-skinned" as Alan appears to be, this could still be a fun place to hang out.
As it is, for some it's just a place to hang out and be a leg hugger. | |
| | |
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 1851
Location: Newington, CT | Originally posted by Slipkid:
I looked at those pictures.
They are just awful.
.
"kerfuffle"... "tri-partite".. in the same paragraph.
Maybe I should be impressed but I know it's just part of your "modus operandi".
It's time to put evil-Slipkid back in the closet but before I do.....
Alan...
You keep thanking me when I don't understand why. I'm in agreement with Schroeder and Temp.
About the "Emperor Has No Clothes" refference.
How you got Schroeder or Al cast as the Emperor I have no clue. To be clear, I see you playing the part of the Emperor. Yep... you are the guy that needed to hear an honest voice.
Don't be humbled by folks trying to communicate their thoughts by bringing up DiMeola, Coryell, or modern jazz. They are just vain attempts to connect what you do to something.... anything ... that exists in the real world.
As I read the comments there is no "supreme compliment" to be found in the refferences.
If you really truly wanted to demonstrate what Woody's guitar can do, For God's sake... play some thing relateable. Two tracks... one with a twelve bar blues and another with a simple lead would tell the story.
"Alan Smithee" is the pen name authors use when they are so embarassed by the material they do not want their real name anywhere near it.
And to be clear, this is not just about "OpeningInG"... I have felt this way about all your offerings. It's just that up until now I have been able to keep Evil-Slipkid on a short leash.
Call it tough love, brutal honesty, or just plain cruelty. For pehaps the first time you are hearing the true thoughts of your listeners. I hope you can find a way to benifit from it.
Say Goodnight Evil-Slipkid....
goodniiiight! Soooooo...what are you REALLY trying to say?
I had a big, long reply all thought out, but figured what's the point?
Just so you know, this is the very first feedback I've EVER received -- honest or otherwise -- on the things that I've posted on the ning pages. Except for the "Tropical Breezes" song that I entered into the Guitar contest, which got a really good reaction from the web site's vistors, all of whom had an opportunity to react honestly and negatively...and anonymously to it.
Brad, if you've hated it all for a huge, long time, a nice PM months ago would have been useful. I've posted, what 30 of 'em?!?!? It's not like there's been no opportunity to clue me in!
Some provided helpful and honest feedback for this one, and I very much appreciate it.
All schroeder and Temp added was a bunch of "You're-ugly-and-your-mother-dresses-you-funny-and-your-music-stinks" silliness...
And it should have been pretty obvious to all that my tongue was pretty firmly lodged in my cheek when I tried to turn all that into compliments.
I googled "Alan Smithee"...funny!
The "Al as Emperor" thing referred to Al being the OFC Emperor, not to anything having to do with this "conversation." Heck, he's probably CO-emperor with Miles anyway!
And, as regards the "tough love" thing, c'mon, I never asked for anything but candid reactions to my guitar playing. Not quite sure how my ego or decency or character all needed to be called into question...
Man! What IS it around here that sets off these juvenile feeding frenzies?!?!? | |
| | |
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains | It's the water... | |
| | |
Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 13997
Location: Upper Left USA | Everyone who is even approaching seriousness please...
STEP AWAY FROM THE KEYBOARD!
Before somebody actually thinks their opinion is worthy or something like that.
This is the Internet dangit. Get a grip! | |
| | |
Joined:
November 2010
Posts: 125
Location: Derry NH | Originally posted by dark bar:
Sorry Alan, just kidding around with ya. (Feel free to trash everything I have ever recorded.) I think I'm WAAAAAY too Vanilla, and you're more Heavenly Hash. Somewhere in the middle are the people that actually make money doing this music stuff. with emphasis on hash!! gave me a flash back, some rogue chunk of blotter just kicked in and now i'm back at a grateful dead show. i can't get some hippy chic in a dirty sundress space dancing outta my head along with some dude screaming 'the fat man rocks!' :D | |
| |
|
An MWoody Recording