LONGNECK
Steve
Posted 2007-02-24 12:48 PM (#319295)
Subject: LONGNECK


Joined:
July 2002
Posts: 1900

Ebay# 220083917810 Nice guitar, high price, no bids...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
CrimsonLake
Posted 2007-02-24 1:48 PM (#319296 - in reply to #319295)
Subject: Re: LONGNECK


Joined:
August 2006
Posts: 3145

Location: Marlton, NJ
The bottle of TiteBond glue in the background would make me a little nervous.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Steve
Posted 2007-02-24 2:55 PM (#319297 - in reply to #319295)
Subject: Re: LONGNECK


Joined:
July 2002
Posts: 1900

Also, a '92 1767-natural in good shape, item# 250084796446. This could be a sleeper, bidding is low with 7 hours left. I play a '92 1767. Nice instrument...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Nasdtrader
Posted 2007-02-24 7:54 PM (#319298 - in reply to #319295)
Subject: Re: LONGNECK


Joined:
February 2007
Posts: 75

Location: Portland, OR
Originally posted by CrimsonLake:
The bottle of TiteBond glue in the background would make me a little nervous.
yeah, but did you see that sweet red velevet cloth he displayed the guitar on?? man.. this guy knows how to sell :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Steve
Posted 2007-02-25 5:55 PM (#319299 - in reply to #319295)
Subject: Re: LONGNECK


Joined:
July 2002
Posts: 1900

The 1767 went for $285...not bad for a nice '92 Legend...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bvince
Posted 2007-02-27 9:22 AM (#319300 - in reply to #319295)
Subject: Re: LONGNECK



Joined:
September 2005
Posts: 3619

Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :)
This longneck is a second listing. He didn't sell it on the first, and it looks like he failed to sell the second time also. If it was a natural top, I wouuld have at least made an offer on it. But I don't care for the cherry burst with that white binding. I don't think they should use a white binding on a dark guitar. It contrasts too much and takes away from the color.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bvince
Posted 2007-02-27 9:26 AM (#319301 - in reply to #319295)
Subject: Re: LONGNECK



Joined:
September 2005
Posts: 3619

Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :)
"The 1767 went for $285...not bad for a nice '92 Legend... "

That WAS a good deal! You would be hard pressed to get that quality of a guitar in even a beginners guitar for the price.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Steve
Posted 2007-02-27 9:43 AM (#319302 - in reply to #319295)
Subject: Re: LONGNECK


Joined:
July 2002
Posts: 1900

I play a '92 1767. It cost me over $600 used. It didn't have scratch on it and the frets were pristine, but still, to get a USA Legend for under $300 is incredible...
Top of the page Bottom of the page