|
|
Joined: September 2008 Posts: 3
Location: USA | Hello everyone. I have a late 1981 or early 1982 Ovation Adamas II. The paper label says model 1691-8. I have not been able to find any information about what exactly a 1691 model is. I can only find information on the 1681. Can anyone help. Do you know the specs of a 1691. Thanks |
|
|
|
Joined: February 2002 Posts: 5750
Location: Scotland | I think you may be misreading the label. The Only Adamas 11 from that period could be the 1681, which is a non-cut electric. Adamas models didn't get a 9 as a third digit until the late 90's with the 1591 Adamas 3 and 1597 SMT. |
|
|
|
 Joined: January 2002 Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | there you go. |
|
|
|
Joined: February 2002 Posts: 5750
Location: Scotland | I need a life. |
|
|
|
 Joined: January 2006 Posts: 5881
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains | This is the OFC. Where else are you gonna get this kind of detailed information, and what are we otherwise good for if not this? Oh sure, the jokes, cross-member ridicule and sarcasm, and bim pics, but what else? |
|
|
|
 Joined: April 2004 Posts: 13303
Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066 | I think you covered it all.
Oh oh....the music on the social site! |
|
|
|
Joined: June 2006 Posts: 7307
Location: South of most, North of few | one more thing, the -8 is blue.... |
|
|
|
Joined: September 2008 Posts: 3
Location: USA | I appreciate your guys help. However, I am not misreading the label. Unless the factory meant to write 1681 and wrote 1691. I have attached some pics to show you the label. Thanks to everyone!
Pic1 Pic3 Pic3 |
|
|
|
Joined: February 2002 Posts: 5750
Location: Scotland | That could be it, a typo. The label style is right for an early 80's AD11. If it's a deepbowl, non-cutaway, blueburst Adamas 2 with electronics, then it's a 1681-8.
Only other thing I can think of is at that time the Adamas 2 was available to special order in a 1 7/8ths wide-neck version. Not sure what model number was applied to a wide-neck AD11. Anyone?
Post a few more pics. |
|
|
|
Joined: September 2008 Posts: 3
Location: USA | Paul,
Thanks. When you say deep bowl what should the depth measurement be for a deep bowl? |
|
|
|
 Joined: January 2006 Posts: 5881
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains | The difference is only 10 numbers off, which represents an error rate of only .0059, or worded differently, a successful error-free rate of 99.41%! This kind of logic works for a lot of people in this world. |
|
|
|
Joined: February 2002 Posts: 5750
Location: Scotland | Originally posted by iluvgeetars:
Paul,
Thanks. When you say deep bowl what should the depth measurement be for a deep bowl? It's 6 1/16th. At that time, early 80's, the Adamas was available in deepbowl only, there were no supershallow or mid-depth Adamas models until much later. |
|
|
|
Joined: December 2006 Posts: 6268
Location: Florida Central Gulf Coast | Originally posted by ProfessorBB:
This kind of logic works for a lot of people in this world. Unfortunately too many! Further comments over at 'IDon'tWantaVacation @ WeElected'em.crap'.
iluvgeetars , send this info/pics to the MotherShip. I'd luv to see the reply!
BTW, to the 'madness'!!! |
|
|
|
Joined: June 2006 Posts: 7307
Location: South of most, North of few | Originally posted by ProfessorBB:
The difference is only 10 numbers off, which represents an error rate of only .0059, or worded differently, a successful error-free rate of 99.41%! This kind of logic works for a lot of people in this world. And, again, why we call him the Professor ;) |
|
|
|
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 15676
Location: SoCal | Originally posted by Paul Templeman:
I need a life. ...been telling you that for years......
282 .... remember |
|
|
|
 Joined: January 2002 Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | I think we did make some wide necks but they were 1682-...
I can't think what the 9 would be. Maybe we have to ask Nick. |
|
|
|
Joined: November 2007 Posts: 1486
Location: Cincinnati | Can you post some photos of the guitar? |
|
|
|
Joined: August 2004 Posts: 709
Location: Germany | Right, the wide necks were 1682.
Karl |
|
|